Databases
StackOverflow2013
Usersdbo
USMarco Pagliaricci
 

Note that there are some explanatory texts on larger screens.

plurals
  1. USMarco Pagliaricci
    primarykey
    data
    text
    plurals
    1. POcan the infamous `ERROR_NETNAME_DELETED' error be considered an error at all?
      singulars
      1. PTQuestion
    1. POoverloaded global new operator issue with msvc2008
      singulars
      1. PTQuestion
    2. POcan the infamous `ERROR_NETNAME_DELETED' error be considered an error at all?
      singulars
      1. PTQuestion
    3. POUnique syncronization object to wait N threads completion
      singulars
      1. PTQuestion
    1. VO
      singulars
      1. POPOSIX AIO: Any (good) way to correlate completion notifications back to original request?
      1. USMarco Pagliaricci
      1. VTFavorite
    2. VO
      singulars
      1. POGetQueuedCompletionStatus can't dequeue IO from IOCP if the thread which originally issued the IO is blocking in ReadFile under windows 8
      1. USMarco Pagliaricci
      1. VTFavorite
    1. COI indeed never deallocate the stream until all operations pending are completed. Since I do only 1 operation each time, I have 2 flags: pending read, and pending write, so when i have 00==no pending operations, 11==pending both write and reading, 01==pending read, and so on. I set the flag on before calling ReadFile() and I set it off in the iocp handler. Here I don't need atomic flags, nor atomic counters because I perform only 1 operation, correct?
      singulars
      1. PO
      1. USMarco Pagliaricci
    2. COIf the packet is pending, I'll do that on the iocp handler, if its not pending anymore, and not used anymore, I must deallocate it from the Stream's dtor, or it will leak a packet. Now the problem is that I don't know if I need some atomic counter (or even a boleean value) which simply tells me *atomically* that the packet is not pending anymore, no other threads has any kind of ownership on it, so I can delete it from Stream's dtor. Someone say that I do not need atomicity here, but is that true? I'm a bit doubtful here.
      singulars
      1. PO
      1. USMarco Pagliaricci
    3. COThanks Len. Well, I have a general purpose framework here, so I don't need to expose io requests packets to the user, instead I want to hide them. With the normal design of (A) taking an io req. packet from a pool and (B) put it back on the pool from the iocp handler thread would indeed brings a new bottleneck: the locking of the pool. My aim here is to keep the same io req. packet, until the life of the connection, so until the life of the Stream object. Now the only concern I have is *when* I have to deallocate the io req. packet, inside Stream's dtor, or inside iocp handler?
      singulars
      1. PO
      1. USMarco Pagliaricci
 

Querying!

 
Guidance
A row detail

Detail views are divided into sections. All the information in the data section comes from columns in the selected row. The other sections display data from other, related rows.

Related data can be related in a to-one or a to-many fashion. Captions of data related in a to-many fashion link to a list view showing a filtered view of the table.

Try moving around until you find a non-empty to-many entry and click on the label to get to one. You can move back to the root by clicking on the database name in the header.

SQuiL has stopped working due to an internal error.

If you are curious you may find further information in the browser console, which is accessible through the devtools (F12).

Reload