Databases
StackOverflow2013
Usersdbo
USalx9r
 

Note that there are some explanatory texts on larger screens.

plurals
  1. USalx9r
    primarykey
    data
    text
    plurals
    1. PO
      singulars
      1. PTAnswer
    2. POIs there a better method than <!ENTITY> to reuse a complicated table in DocBook?
      singulars
      1. PTQuestion
    1. POCan DocBook elements be subclassed using the 'role' attribute? If so, how?
      singulars
      1. PTQuestion
    2. POIs there a better method than <!ENTITY> to reuse a complicated table in DocBook?
      singulars
      1. PTQuestion
    3. PO
      singulars
      1. PTAnswer
    1. VO
      singulars
      1. POHow to reuse data in XML
      1. USalx9r
      1. VTFavorite
    2. VO
      singulars
      1. PODocbook publishing for different target audiences
      1. USalx9r
      1. VTFavorite
    3. VO
      singulars
      1. POWhat are metaclasses in Python?
      1. USalx9r
      1. VTFavorite
    1. COQuestion #1 is answered. I think question #2 should probably be separated out as I think question #1 is obfuscating the heart of the matter of question #2. I'll have to spend some time in meta to figure out how to properly do that. Regardless, I appreciate your help.
      singulars
      1. POIs there a better method than <!ENTITY> to reuse a complicated table in DocBook?
      1. USalx9r
    2. COI added a picture of what I want the published output of 'test2.xml' to look like -- hopefully that makes my goal a bit more clear. Could you elaborate on "You can do that." The `ReusedTable` entity in 'test2.xml' is not part of the DocBook schema so produces validation errors. I assume that the schema could be extended to include this new entity (there are examples for how to do this), but how do I tell my tools to translate `ReusedTable` into the table I want when they encounter `ReusedTable`. I've searched unsuccessfully for an example of an xsl template that handles a schema extension.
      singulars
      1. POIs there a better method than <!ENTITY> to reuse a complicated table in DocBook?
      1. USalx9r
    3. CO@DevNull I tried your suggestion of putting the ReusedTable directly into the entity declaration and eventually got it to work. For some reason I was operating under the assumption that multiline entity declarations are not supported. Oxygen XML seems to support them just fine. So, putting the ReusedTable directly in the entity declaration seems to be the answer to my question #1.
      singulars
      1. POIs there a better method than <!ENTITY> to reuse a complicated table in DocBook?
      1. USalx9r
 

Querying!

 
Guidance
A row detail

Detail views are divided into sections. All the information in the data section comes from columns in the selected row. The other sections display data from other, related rows.

Related data can be related in a to-one or a to-many fashion. Captions of data related in a to-many fashion link to a list view showing a filtered view of the table.

Try moving around until you find a non-empty to-many entry and click on the label to get to one. You can move back to the root by clicking on the database name in the header.

SQuiL has stopped working due to an internal error.

If you are curious you may find further information in the browser console, which is accessible through the devtools (F12).

Reload