Note that there are some explanatory texts on larger screens.

plurals
  1. USgianluca
    primarykey
    data
    text
    plurals
    1. This table or related slice is empty.
    1. COJust to clarify WHY their data is not good to me. Being generated from real people associations are NOT guaranteed to be coherent. It may happen (and it does all the time) that some word given as stimulus generates a response which has nothing to do with the stimulus itself for anyone but the person who generated it. For example, if you say "wind" I could easily answer "Trieste" since I live there and in Trieste there is A LOT of wind! However Trieste has nothing to do with the "wind" concept by itself and anyone who has never been there will NEVER reply "Trieste" to your stimulus.
      singulars
    2. COThanks, this is a good resource. Unfortunately it's not what I am looking for. I want to build a similar correlation matrix but EAT has a different approach: they show a word to a large number of people asking them to reply with the first word which comes to their mind and then gather all association data. Their data has been generated by people (i.e. REAL BRAINS). What my program should do is to build the whole data by itself using ONLY the vocabulary definitions. Furthermore, the database it provides does not contain any definition. It only contains a word list and their association norms.
      singulars
    3. COStill, thank you very much! If you want to put an answer down here I would be happy to mark it as the correct answer and lift your reputation on the site!
      singulars
 

Querying!

 
Guidance

SQuiL has stopped working due to an internal error.

If you are curious you may find further information in the browser console, which is accessible through the devtools (F12).

Reload