Databases
StackOverflow2013
Postsdbo
PO2.0/3.5 assemblies side-by-side
 

Note that there are some explanatory texts on larger screens.

plurals
  1. PO2.0/3.5 assemblies side-by-side
    primarykey
    data
    text
    <p>I have a web application that I expect to intergrate features in assemblies from two separate providers. One set (Set1) of assemblies is build on .NET 2.0 while the other set (Set2) of assemblies <strong><em>ABSOLUTELY</em></strong> requires .NET 3.5. For Set2 assemblies to work, I have to add a (<strong>system.codedom</strong>) section to web.config and specify the v3.5 compiler. However, that seems to break code referencing Set1 assemblies (the JIT compiler takes forever and request times out). When I remove the <strong>system.codedom</strong> section, some features of the application referencing Set2 fail.</p> <p>We started this project with the knowledge that .NET 2.0 and 3.5 can coexist without any problems. Is there any way of making these two sets of assemblies play nicely?</p> <p><strong>EDIT:</strong> Here is what the system.codedom section looks like;</p> <pre><code> &lt;system.codedom&gt; &lt;compilers&gt; &lt;compiler language="c#;cs;csharp" extension=".cs" type="Microsoft.CSharp.CSharpCodeProvider,System, Version=2.0.0.0, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=b77a5c561934e089" warningLevel="4"&gt; &lt;providerOption name="CompilerVersion" value="v3.5"/&gt; &lt;providerOption name="WarnAsError" value="false"/&gt; &lt;/compiler&gt; &lt;compiler language="vb;vbs;visualbasic;vbscript" extension=".vb" type="Microsoft.VisualBasic.VBCodeProvider, System, Version=2.0.0.0, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=b77a5c561934e089" warningLevel="4"&gt; &lt;providerOption name="CompilerVersion" value="v3.5"/&gt; &lt;providerOption name="OptionInfer" value="true"/&gt; &lt;providerOption name="WarnAsError" value="false"/&gt; &lt;/compiler&gt; &lt;/compilers&gt; </code></pre> <p></p>
    singulars
    1. PO
      singulars
      1. PTAnswer
    1. This table or related slice is empty.
    1. PTQuestion
    1. USAlfero Chingono
    1. USAlfero Chingono
    plurals
    1. This table or related slice is empty.
    1. This table or related slice is empty.
    1. This table or related slice is empty.
    1. PO
      singulars
      1. PTAnswer
    2. PO
      singulars
      1. PTAnswer
    3. PO
      singulars
      1. PTAnswer
    1. This table or related slice is empty.
    1. COCan you recompile Set1 in .Net 3.5?
      singulars
      1. PO2.0/3.5 assemblies side-by-side
      1. USJ.W.
    2. COI do not have the source.
      singulars
      1. PO2.0/3.5 assemblies side-by-side
      1. USAlfero Chingono
    3. CO.NET 2.0 and 3.5 can coexists as long as one application is running as 2.0 and another one as 3.5 so there are two runtimes loaded. Within one application (process) you can use only one version.
      singulars
      1. PO2.0/3.5 assemblies side-by-side
      1. USJozef Izso
 

Querying!

 
Guidance
A row detail

Detail views are divided into sections. All the information in the data section comes from columns in the selected row. The other sections display data from other, related rows.

Related data can be related in a to-one or a to-many fashion. Captions of data related in a to-many fashion link to a list view showing a filtered view of the table.

Try moving around until you find a non-empty to-many entry and click on the label to get to one. You can move back to the root by clicking on the database name in the header.

SQuiL has stopped working due to an internal error.

If you are curious you may find further information in the browser console, which is accessible through the devtools (F12).

Reload