Note that there are some explanatory texts on larger screens.

plurals
  1. POusing jquery's find method on a documentFragment attached node
    primarykey
    data
    text
    <p>I am writing an application that converts an ajax xml response into html using client side xslt transformation. The transformation is achieved using following snippet, which works fine -</p> <pre><code> transform:function(xml){ if (window.XSLTProcessor){ var xsltProcessor = new XSLTProcessor(); xsltProcessor.importStylesheet(Xmer.xsldoc); var outputXHTML = xsltProcessor.transformToFragment(Xmer.makeXml(xml), document); document.getElementById('tree').appendChild(outputXHTML.cloneNode(true)); } else if(window.ActiveXObject){ //Internet Explorer var d=Xmer.makeXml(xml); var outputXHTML = (d).transformNode(Xmer.xsldoc); document.getElementById('tree').innerHTML=outputXHTML; } } </code></pre> <p>But problem is encountered in FF when i try to process the inserted tags using jquery's find method. I am trying to fetch all the divs with a specific class name that were inserted by the above code; using the following -</p> <pre><code> var d=$document.find('div.pointer'); alert ($('div.pointer').length); alert (d.length); </code></pre> <p>but the above alerts always return "0" length. The same code works fine in IE. I am using jquery 1.3.2.</p> <p>to add more to the above, I did some research on documentFragments and found following on <a href="http://ejohn.org/blog/dom-documentfragments/#comment-319149" rel="nofollow noreferrer">http://ejohn.org/blog/dom-documentfragments/#comment-319149</a> (need to click "Show Comments" to reach this place) -</p> <p>"# Obvious, but sometimes overlooked: the fragment is self contained. This means, the fragment doesn't have access to objects outside of it (i.e. part of the main document). Thus, even if you have CSS classes (class attribute) set in an element, it is not possible to query based on properties set and/or modified by that CSS class. Basically the classes set in the class attribute, if defined outside the fragment, become just simple labels."</p> <p>so this means searching elements inside the fragment is not supported.</p> <p>Is there any work around available for this?</p> <p>I apologize if something along these lines has been discussed earlier and would appreciate if someone guides me in this.</p> <p>Thanks, amit </p>
    singulars
    1. This table or related slice is empty.
    plurals
    1. This table or related slice is empty.
    1. This table or related slice is empty.
    1. This table or related slice is empty.
    1. This table or related slice is empty.
 

Querying!

 
Guidance

SQuiL has stopped working due to an internal error.

If you are curious you may find further information in the browser console, which is accessible through the devtools (F12).

Reload