Databases
StackOverflow2013
Postsdbo
PO
 

Note that there are some explanatory texts on larger screens.

plurals
  1. PO
    primarykey
    data
    text
    <p>I know this is an old thread, but I thought I'd post a vote for <a href="http://xunit.github.io/" rel="noreferrer">xUnit.NET</a>. While most of the other testing frameworks mentioned are all pretty much the same, xUnit.NET has taken a pretty unique, modern, and flexible approach to unit testing. It changes terminology, so you no longer define TestFixtures and Tests...you specify Facts and Theories about your code, which integrates better with the concept of what a test is from a TDD/BDD perspective. </p> <p>xUnit.NET is also EXTREMELY extensible. Its FactAttribute and TraitAttribute attribute classes are not sealed, and provide overridable base methods that give you a lot of control over how the methods those attributes decorate should be executed. While xUnit.NET in its default form allows you to write test classes that are similar to NUnit test fixtures with their test methods, you are not confined to this form of unit testing at all. You are free to extend the framework to support BDD-style Concern/Context/Observation specifications, as depicted <a href="http://iridescence.no/post/Extending-xUnit-with-a-Custom-ObservationAttribute-for-BDD-Style-Testing.aspx" rel="noreferrer">here</a>. </p> <p>xUnit.NET also supports fit-style testing directly out of the box with its Theory attribute and corresponding data attributes. Fit input data may be loaded from excel, database, or even a custom data source such as a Word document (by extending the base data attribute.) This allows you to capitalize on a single testing platform for both unit tests and integration tests, which can be huge in reducing product dependencies and required training.</p> <p>Other approaches to testing may also be implemented with xUnit.NET...the possibilities are pretty limitless. Combined with another very forward looking mocking framework, <a href="http://code.google.com/p/moq/" rel="noreferrer">Moq</a>, the two create a very flexible, extensible, and powerful platform for implementing automated testing.</p>
    singulars
    1. This table or related slice is empty.
    1. PONUnit vs. MbUnit vs. MSTest vs. xUnit.net
      singulars
      1. PTQuestion
    1. PTAnswer
    1. USLiath
    1. USjrista
    plurals
    1. This table or related slice is empty.
    1. This table or related slice is empty.
    1. PONUnit vs. MbUnit vs. MSTest vs. xUnit.net
      singulars
      1. PTQuestion
    1. This table or related slice is empty.
    1. VO
      singulars
      1. PO
      1. This table or related slice is empty.
      1. VTUpMod
    2. VO
      singulars
      1. PO
      1. This table or related slice is empty.
      1. VTUpMod
    3. VO
      singulars
      1. PO
      1. This table or related slice is empty.
      1. VTUpMod
    1. COWhile this was true a year+ ago, NUnit has since added most of the attributes in question. In NUnit you can write tests either way.
      singulars
      1. PO
      1. USMark Levison
    2. COIts not so much about which attributes are available, but how they can be used. xUnit.NET was designed from the ground up to be a highly flexible and extensible framework that did not lock you into any particular method of testing, and does not require you to regularly update the core framework to get the latest capabilities.
      singulars
      1. PO
      1. USjrista
    3. CO1. Sightly different names on attributes won't make much of a point. 2. NUnit was extensible and it continues to be extensible :? 3. data row parameters for tests are supported in nunit. Time ago they were supported in an extension :) 4. Nunit combined with Moq creates the same thing. 5. For BDD I'd say specflow, that integrates easily with many unit testing frameworks.
      singulars
      1. PO
      1. USgraffic
 

Querying!

 
Guidance
A row detail

Detail views are divided into sections. All the information in the data section comes from columns in the selected row. The other sections display data from other, related rows.

Related data can be related in a to-one or a to-many fashion. Captions of data related in a to-many fashion link to a list view showing a filtered view of the table.

Try moving around until you find a non-empty to-many entry and click on the label to get to one. You can move back to the root by clicking on the database name in the header.

SQuiL has stopped working due to an internal error.

If you are curious you may find further information in the browser console, which is accessible through the devtools (F12).

Reload