Databases
StackOverflow2013
Postsdbo
PO
 

Note that there are some explanatory texts on larger screens.

plurals
  1. PO
    primarykey
    data
    text
    <p>Tested on <code>5.0.77</code>:</p> <pre> SELECT VERSION(); VERSION() 5.0.77 CREATE TABLE organization ( `id` INT(11) NOT NULL AUTO_INCREMENT, `officeSymbol` VARCHAR(45) DEFAULT NULL, PRIMARY KEY (`id`) ) ENGINE=InnoDB DEFAULT CHARSET=latin1; CREATE TABLE system ( `id` INT(11) NOT NULL AUTO_INCREMENT, `systemName` VARCHAR(45) DEFAULT NULL, `idOrganization` INT(11) DEFAULT NULL, PRIMARY KEY (`id`), KEY `fk_system_organization` (`idOrganization`), CONSTRAINT `fk_system_organization` FOREIGN KEY (`idOrganization`) REFERENCES `organization` (`id`) ON DELETE NO ACTION ON UPDATE NO ACTION ) ENGINE=InnoDB DEFAULT CHARSET=latin1; INSERT INTO organization VALUES (1, 'Organization 1'), (2, 'Organization 2'); INSERT INTO system VALUES (1, 'System 1', 1), (2, 'System 2', 2); SELECT system.systemName, organization.officeSymbol FROM system LEFT JOIN (organization) ON (system.idOrganization = organization.id); systemName officeSymbol System 1 Organization 1 System 2 Organization 2 </pre> <p>Everything works fine.</p> <p>Note that <code>LEFT JOIN</code> is useless here, since you have a <code>FOREIGN KEY</code> to <code>organization</code>, and there will always be an <code>organization</code> for every given <code>system</code>.</p> <p>In your comment to <code>@Artem Barger</code>'s post you said:</p> <blockquote> <p>I'm only selecting on 5 of the 42 fields shared between these 2 tables</p> </blockquote> <p>Is it that there are other fields in the tables and/or query?</p> <p>Since you have a syntactic error, every comma may matter.</p>
    singulars
    1. This table or related slice is empty.
    1. POAmbiguous `id` Field
      singulars
      1. PTQuestion
    1. PTAnswer
    1. USQuassnoi
    1. USQuassnoi
    plurals
    1. This table or related slice is empty.
    1. This table or related slice is empty.
    1. POAmbiguous `id` Field
      singulars
      1. PTQuestion
    1. This table or related slice is empty.
    1. VO
      singulars
      1. PO
      1. This table or related slice is empty.
      1. VTUpMod
    2. VO
      singulars
      1. PO
      1. This table or related slice is empty.
      1. VTUpMod
    3. VO
      singulars
      1. PO
      1. This table or related slice is empty.
      1. VTUpMod
    1. CO+1 for being less lazy than myself.
      singulars
      1. PO
      1. USTodd Gardner
    2. COPosted the creation scripts as requested as well as version information. The query is just being run directly in query browser at the moment, returning Column 'id' in field list is ambiguous, ErrorNo: 1052.
      singulars
      1. PO
      1. USMichael Wales
    3. COOther fields within the tables. My concern is, using DISTINCT would only return unique rows given this query, but there may be other data that leads these two records to render two result rows (but I don't want that data returned to the end user). Syntax errors are just due to typing - this code resides on an independent network, but I am confident it is valid over there.
      singulars
      1. PO
      1. USMichael Wales
 

Querying!

 
Guidance
A row detail

Detail views are divided into sections. All the information in the data section comes from columns in the selected row. The other sections display data from other, related rows.

Related data can be related in a to-one or a to-many fashion. Captions of data related in a to-many fashion link to a list view showing a filtered view of the table.

Try moving around until you find a non-empty to-many entry and click on the label to get to one. You can move back to the root by clicking on the database name in the header.

SQuiL has stopped working due to an internal error.

If you are curious you may find further information in the browser console, which is accessible through the devtools (F12).

Reload