Databases
StackOverflow2013
Postsdbo
PO
 

Note that there are some explanatory texts on larger screens.

plurals
  1. PO
    primarykey
    data
    text
    <p>If you look closely at your code you'll see that the <code>second</code> property in your test is still an instance of <code>Second</code>, not a mock (you don't pass the mock to <code>first</code> in your code).</p> <p>The simplest way would be to create a setter for <code>second</code> in <code>First</code> class and pass it the mock explicitly.</p> <p>Like this:</p> <pre><code>public class First { Second second ; public First(){ second = new Second(); } public String doSecond(){ return second.doSecond(); } public void setSecond(Second second) { this.second = second; } } class Second { public String doSecond(){ return "Do Something"; } } .... public void testFirst(){ Second sec = mock(Second.class); when(sec.doSecond()).thenReturn("Stubbed Second"); First first = new First(); first.setSecond(sec) assertEquals("Stubbed Second", first.doSecond()); } </code></pre> <p>Another would be to pass a <code>Second</code> instance as <code>First</code>'s constructor parameter.</p> <p>If you can't modify the code, I think the only option would be to use reflection:</p> <pre><code>public void testFirst(){ Second sec = mock(Second.class); when(sec.doSecond()).thenReturn("Stubbed Second"); First first = new First(); Field privateField = PrivateObject.class. getDeclaredField("second"); privateField.setAccessible(true); privateField.set(first, sec); assertEquals("Stubbed Second", first.doSecond()); } </code></pre> <p>But you probably can, as it's rare to do tests on code you don't control (although one can imagine a scenario where you have to test an external library cause it's author didn't :))</p>
    singulars
    1. This table or related slice is empty.
    1. POMocking member variables of a class using Mockito
      singulars
      1. PTQuestion
    1. PTAnswer
    1. USsoulcheck
    1. USsoulcheck
    plurals
    1. This table or related slice is empty.
    1. This table or related slice is empty.
    1. This table or related slice is empty.
    1. This table or related slice is empty.
    1. VO
      singulars
      1. PO
      1. This table or related slice is empty.
      1. VTUpMod
    2. VO
      singulars
      1. PO
      1. This table or related slice is empty.
      1. VTUpMod
    3. VO
      singulars
      1. PO
      1. This table or related slice is empty.
      1. VTUpMod
    1. COGot it. I will probably go with your first suggestion.
      singulars
      1. PO
      1. USAnand Hemmige
    2. COJust curious, is there any way or API you are aware of that can mock an object/method at application level or package level. ? I guess what I am saying is, in the above example when I mock 'Second' object, is there a way it can override every instance of Second that is used through the lifecycle of testing. ?
      singulars
      1. PO
      1. USAnand Hemmige
    3. CO@AnandHemmige actually the second one (constructor) is cleaner, as it avoids creating unnecesary `Second´ instances. Your classes get nicely decoupled that way.
      singulars
      1. PO
      1. USsoulcheck
 

Querying!

 
Guidance
A row detail

Detail views are divided into sections. All the information in the data section comes from columns in the selected row. The other sections display data from other, related rows.

Related data can be related in a to-one or a to-many fashion. Captions of data related in a to-many fashion link to a list view showing a filtered view of the table.

Try moving around until you find a non-empty to-many entry and click on the label to get to one. You can move back to the root by clicking on the database name in the header.

SQuiL has stopped working due to an internal error.

If you are curious you may find further information in the browser console, which is accessible through the devtools (F12).

Reload