Databases
StackOverflow2013
Postsdbo
PO
 

Note that there are some explanatory texts on larger screens.

plurals
  1. PO
    primarykey
    data
    text
    <p>A loop doesn't create a new variable scope. You need to create the click handler in a separate function, and pass whatever needs to be scoped into that function.</p> <pre><code> // creates the handler with the scoped item, and returns the handler function create_handler(this_item) { return function () { $('.item', $itemCr).hide(); $(this_item).show(); }; } var i = tabAmount; var a_els = $('a', $tabCr); var items = $('.item', $itemCr); while (i--) { var item = items[i], tab = a_els[i]; $(tab).click( create_handler(item) ); } </code></pre> <p>Also note that you should not do <em>DOM selection</em> in a loop. Cache it once outside the loop, and reference it in the loop as I did above.</p> <hr> <p>It seems that there have been some changes to the code from the original question. I'd rewrite the code like this:</p> <pre><code>carousel: function(){ var $carouselCr = $('#carousel'), $tabCr = $('.carouselTabs', $carouselCr), $itemCr = $('.carouselContents', $carouselCr), $items = $('.item', $itemCr), $a_els = $('a', $tabCr); if($a_els.length !== $items.length) throw "error: verschillend aantal tabs vs items"; $a_els.each(function(i) { $(this).click(function() { $items.hide(); $items.eq(i).show(); }); }); } </code></pre> <p>Now each <code>.click()</code> handler is referencing a unique <code>i</code>, which is the index of the current <code>$a_els</code> element in the iteration.</p> <p>So for example when a click happens on the <code>$a_els</code> at index <code>3</code>, <code>$items.eq(i).show();</code> will show the <code>$items</code> element that is also at index <code>3</code>.</p> <hr> <p>Another approach is to use event delegation, where you place the handler on the container, and provide a selector to determine if the handler should be invoked.</p> <p>If you're using jQuery 1.7 or later, you'd use <code>.on()</code>...</p> <pre><code>carousel: function(){ var $carouselCr = $('#carousel'), $tabCr = $('.carouselTabs', $carouselCr), $itemCr = $('.carouselContents', $carouselCr), $a_els = $('a', $tabCr), $items = $('.item', $itemCr); if($a_els.length !== $items.length) throw "error: verschillend aantal tabs vs items"; $tabCr.on('click','a',function() { var idx = $a_els.index( this ); // get the index of the clicked &lt;a&gt; $items.hide(); $items.eq(idx).show(); // ...and use that index to show the content }); } </code></pre> <p>Or before jQuery 1.7, you'd use <code>.delegate()</code>...</p> <pre><code>carousel: function(){ var $carouselCr = $('#carousel'), $tabCr = $('.carouselTabs', $carouselCr), $itemCr = $('.carouselContents', $carouselCr), $a_els = $('a', $tabCr), $items = $('.item', $itemCr); if($a_els.length !== $items.length) throw "error: verschillend aantal tabs vs items"; $tabCr.delegate('a','click',function() { var idx = $a_els.index( this ); // get the index of the clicked &lt;a&gt;... $items.hide(); $items.eq(idx).show(); // ...and use that index to show the content }); } </code></pre> <p>This way there's only one handler bound to the <code>$tabCr</code> container. It check to see if the item clicked matches the <code>'a'</code> selector, and if so, it invokes the handler.</p> <p>If there are other elements in between the <code>&lt;a&gt;...&lt;/a&gt;</code> elements or the <code>&lt;div class="item"&gt;...&lt;/div&gt;</code> elements so that the indices don't naturally match up, we'd need to tweak the <code>.index()</code> call just a bit.</p>
    singulars
    1. This table or related slice is empty.
    1. POVariables in loop
      singulars
      1. PTQuestion
    1. PTAnswer
    1. This table or related slice is empty.
    1. This table or related slice is empty.
    plurals
    1. This table or related slice is empty.
    1. This table or related slice is empty.
    1. POVariables in loop
      singulars
      1. PTQuestion
    1. This table or related slice is empty.
    1. VO
      singulars
      1. PO
      1. This table or related slice is empty.
      1. VTUpMod
    2. VO
      singulars
      1. PO
      1. This table or related slice is empty.
      1. VTUpMod
    3. VO
      singulars
      1. PO
      1. This table or related slice is empty.
      1. VTAcceptedByOriginator
    1. COThanks for all the suggestions! Using .each() is actually what i usually do. I thought i read somewhere that using a regular javascript loop is faster.
      singulars
      1. PO
      1. USdubbelj
    2. CO@dubbelj: Yes, a `for` statement would normally be faster, because `.each()` needs to invoke a function on each iteration of the loop. But since you need to invoke a function anyway to create the variable scope, then it doesn't really matter which you use. There are probably ways to accomplish what you need without scoping variables, but we would need to see your HTML structure.
      singulars
      1. PO
      1. This table or related slice is empty.
    3. COI understand. I added some HTML structure. Don't feel obligated to go into this any further. My problems are solved.
      singulars
      1. PO
      1. USdubbelj
 

Querying!

 
Guidance
A row detail

Detail views are divided into sections. All the information in the data section comes from columns in the selected row. The other sections display data from other, related rows.

Related data can be related in a to-one or a to-many fashion. Captions of data related in a to-many fashion link to a list view showing a filtered view of the table.

Try moving around until you find a non-empty to-many entry and click on the label to get to one. You can move back to the root by clicking on the database name in the header.

SQuiL has stopped working due to an internal error.

If you are curious you may find further information in the browser console, which is accessible through the devtools (F12).

Reload