Databases
StackOverflow2013
Postsdbo
PO
 

Note that there are some explanatory texts on larger screens.

plurals
  1. PO
    primarykey
    data
    text
    <p>Definitely PUSHD / POPD is the preferred way to do this. But there is a (undocumented?) feature of SETLOCAL / ENDLOCAL that accomplishes the same thing (in addition to everything else SETLOCAL does).</p> <p>If you change directory after a SETLOCAL, then you will return to the original directory upon ENDLOCAL.</p> <pre><code>cd OriginalLocation setlocal cd NewLocation endlocal rem we are back to OriginalLocation </code></pre> <p>One other thing with SETLOCAL that <em>is</em> documented - Any SETLOCAL within a called batch or :label routine will be terminated with an implicit ENDLOCAL upon exiting the batch or routine. The implicit ENDLOCAL will return to the original folder just as an explicit ENDLOCAL.</p> <pre><code>cd OriginalLocation call :ChangeLocation rem - We are back to OriginalLocation because :ChangeLocation did CD after a SETLOCAL rem - and there is an implicit ENDLOCAL upon return exit /b :ChangeLocation setlocal cd NewLocation exit /b </code></pre> <p>I wouldn't recommend using SETLOCAL/ENDLOCAL instead of PUSHD/POPD. But it is a behavior you should be aware of.</p> <p><strong><em>Response to johnny's comment</em></strong></p> <p>It can get confusing when PUSHD/POPD and SETLOCAL/ENDLOCAL are combined. The ENDLOCAL does <strong><em>not</em></strong> clear the PUSHD stack, as evidenced by the following:</p> <pre><code>setlocal cd test @cd pushd new @cd endlocal @cd popd @cd </code></pre> <p>--OUTPUT--</p> <pre><code>D:\test&gt;setlocal D:\test&gt;cd test D:\test\test D:\test\test&gt;pushd new D:\test\test\new D:\test\test\new&gt;endlocal D:\test D:\test&gt;popd D:\test\test </code></pre>
    singulars
    1. This table or related slice is empty.
    1. POHow to return to the original directory after invoking change directory in DOS batch?
      singulars
      1. PTQuestion
    1. PTAnswer
    1. USdbenham
    1. USdbenham
    plurals
    1. This table or related slice is empty.
    1. This table or related slice is empty.
    1. This table or related slice is empty.
    1. This table or related slice is empty.
    1. VO
      singulars
      1. PO
      1. This table or related slice is empty.
      1. VTUpMod
    2. VO
      singulars
      1. PO
      1. This table or related slice is empty.
      1. VTUpMod
    1. CO@johnny - Not true (at least not true on Win 7 where I tested). The pushd stack is preserved. See my updated answer.
      singulars
      1. PO
      1. USdbenham
    2. COmy bad; I swear I'd tested that over and over before posting (since it did seem strange), but I deleted my test scripts when I was done with them and now can't duplicate what I _thought_ I was seeing... unmatched pushd/popd's within scripts or subroutines can still be an issue, though...
      singulars
      1. PO
      1. USjohnny
 

Querying!

 
Guidance
A row detail

Detail views are divided into sections. All the information in the data section comes from columns in the selected row. The other sections display data from other, related rows.

Related data can be related in a to-one or a to-many fashion. Captions of data related in a to-many fashion link to a list view showing a filtered view of the table.

Try moving around until you find a non-empty to-many entry and click on the label to get to one. You can move back to the root by clicking on the database name in the header.

SQuiL has stopped working due to an internal error.

If you are curious you may find further information in the browser console, which is accessible through the devtools (F12).

Reload