Databases
StackOverflow2013
Postsdbo
POMay JavaFX 2.0 be redistributed?
 

Note that there are some explanatory texts on larger screens.

plurals
  1. POMay JavaFX 2.0 be redistributed?
    primarykey
    data
    text
    <p>I'm currently planning to develop a desktop Java application that I might want to distribute in the future. As for the UI technology, I thought about JavaFX, since Swing won't be developed any further and JavaFX seems to have some nice properties.</p> <p>I know that it'll still take a while for JavaFX to be available on more platforms but I assume once it is available on Linux by the end of 2012 it should be fine.</p> <p>Since I want the requirements for my app to be as low as possible and installation as smooth as possible I'd like to redistribute the JavaFX runtime along with the app. The only requirement for the app to run should be an existing JRE.</p> <p>However, I'm a bit confused on whether I'm allowed to redistribute the JavaFX runtime or not.</p> <p><a href="http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/java/javafx/documentation/default-494799.html" rel="noreferrer">Oracle</a> says:</p> <blockquote> <p>Redistributing the JavaFX Runtime is not allowed as per the terms and conditions in the License Agreement.</p> </blockquote> <p>Whereas <a href="http://javafx.com/faq/" rel="noreferrer">JavaFX.com</a> suggests:</p> <blockquote> <p>Several deployment options are available for application developers who want to make the JavaFX Runtime installation as smooth as possible for end users:</p> <ul><li>Redistribute the JavaFX Runtime tightly integrated with your Java application.</li></ul> </blockquote> <p>Does anyone know which is true or maybe what the differences are (when am I allowed to redistribute the runtime, when not) ?</p>
    singulars
    1. PO
      singulars
      1. PTAnswer
    1. This table or related slice is empty.
    1. PTQuestion
    1. This table or related slice is empty.
    1. USThomas
    plurals
    1. This table or related slice is empty.
    1. PL
      singulars
      1. LTLinked
    2. PL
      singulars
      1. LTLinked
    1. This table or related slice is empty.
    1. PO
      singulars
      1. PTAnswer
    1. VO
      singulars
      1. POMay JavaFX 2.0 be redistributed?
      1. This table or related slice is empty.
      1. VTDownMod
    2. VO
      singulars
      1. POMay JavaFX 2.0 be redistributed?
      1. This table or related slice is empty.
      1. VTUpMod
    3. VO
      singulars
      1. POMay JavaFX 2.0 be redistributed?
      1. USSergey Grinev
      1. VTFavorite
    1. CO"Swing won't be developed any further". Really? Do you have a link for that?
      singulars
      1. POMay JavaFX 2.0 be redistributed?
      1. USThilo
    2. CO@Thilo at least that's what the Oracly guys said at Devox, I don't have link right now. Maybe it's expressed a bit confusingly, what I mean is that Oracle seems to view JavaFX as the future GUI framework and put most of their efforts into that rather than Swing. - Btw, that isn't the point, I just wanted to give some reasons why I consider JavaFX in order to prevent "use Swing" style comments. The actual question is on the licensing which would influence my decision.
      singulars
      1. POMay JavaFX 2.0 be redistributed?
      1. USThomas
 

Querying!

 
Guidance
A row detail

Detail views are divided into sections. All the information in the data section comes from columns in the selected row. The other sections display data from other, related rows.

Related data can be related in a to-one or a to-many fashion. Captions of data related in a to-many fashion link to a list view showing a filtered view of the table.

Try moving around until you find a non-empty to-many entry and click on the label to get to one. You can move back to the root by clicking on the database name in the header.

SQuiL has stopped working due to an internal error.

If you are curious you may find further information in the browser console, which is accessible through the devtools (F12).

Reload