Databases
StackOverflow2013
Postsdbo
POWith Rhino Mocks should BackToRecord() also clear the count of the number of times a method was called?
 

Note that there are some explanatory texts on larger screens.

plurals
  1. POWith Rhino Mocks should BackToRecord() also clear the count of the number of times a method was called?
    primarykey
    data
    text
    <p>From numerous other questions on SO it is said that in order to reset the count of the number of times a method call was made on a mock object you can call BackToRecord() and then Replay().</p> <p>However this does not work for me. It will reset the stubbed values but not the method call count.</p> <p>So extending an example from a related question...</p> <pre><code>public interface IFoo { string GetBar(); } [TestMethod] public void TestRhino() { var fi = MockRepository.GenerateStub&lt;IFoo&gt;(); fi.Stub(x =&gt; x.GetBar()).Return("A"); Assert.AreEqual("A", fi.GetBar()); fi.AssertWasCalled(x=&gt;x.GetBar(), x=&gt;x.Repeat.Once()); // Switch to record to clear behaviour and then back to replay fi.BackToRecord(BackToRecordOptions.All); fi.Replay(); fi.Stub(x =&gt; x.GetBar()).Return("B"); Assert.AreEqual("B", fi.GetBar()); fi.AssertWasCalled(x =&gt; x.GetBar(), x =&gt; x.Repeat.Once()); } </code></pre> <p>This fails on the last line with 'Expected #1, actual #2'.</p> <p>Am I missing the point or does it simply not work for the method count? Is there anyway to achieve this without creating a new mock?</p> <p>For reasons that I won't go into I am not able to set up expectations before making the call to GetBar().</p>
    singulars
    1. PO
      singulars
      1. PTAnswer
    1. This table or related slice is empty.
    1. PTQuestion
    1. USSimon Keep
    1. USSimon Keep
    plurals
    1. This table or related slice is empty.
    1. This table or related slice is empty.
    1. This table or related slice is empty.
    1. PO
      singulars
      1. PTAnswer
    1. VO
      singulars
      1. POWith Rhino Mocks should BackToRecord() also clear the count of the number of times a method was called?
      1. This table or related slice is empty.
      1. VTUpMod
    2. VO
      singulars
      1. POWith Rhino Mocks should BackToRecord() also clear the count of the number of times a method was called?
      1. This table or related slice is empty.
      1. VTUpMod
    3. VO
      singulars
      1. POWith Rhino Mocks should BackToRecord() also clear the count of the number of times a method was called?
      1. This table or related slice is empty.
      1. VTUpMod
    1. COWhats the use case that this needs to be one test? This sounds like it may be a bug in Rhino.Mocks, but I don't see why you'd want to do what you're asking. Why not just make two tests?
      singulars
      1. POWith Rhino Mocks should BackToRecord() also clear the count of the number of times a method was called?
      1. USPatrickSteele
    2. COWe are writing automated Bdd tests and need to switch out an email component with a mock one and then test whether the send method got called. But we are also using Windsor and I don't want to re-register the components afresh for each test as it slows the test suite down too much.
      singulars
      1. POWith Rhino Mocks should BackToRecord() also clear the count of the number of times a method was called?
      1. USSimon Keep
    3. COSo this is more integration testing than unit testing. If you're using Windsor, I wonder if a Handler Selector would help? You could set some flag that the selector could use to determine which email component to return (the "real" one or the "mocked" one) when doing a Resolve.
      singulars
      1. POWith Rhino Mocks should BackToRecord() also clear the count of the number of times a method was called?
      1. USPatrickSteele
 

Querying!

 
Guidance
A row detail

Detail views are divided into sections. All the information in the data section comes from columns in the selected row. The other sections display data from other, related rows.

Related data can be related in a to-one or a to-many fashion. Captions of data related in a to-many fashion link to a list view showing a filtered view of the table.

Try moving around until you find a non-empty to-many entry and click on the label to get to one. You can move back to the root by clicking on the database name in the header.

SQuiL has stopped working due to an internal error.

If you are curious you may find further information in the browser console, which is accessible through the devtools (F12).

Reload