Databases
StackOverflow2013
Postsdbo
PO
 

Note that there are some explanatory texts on larger screens.

plurals
  1. PO
    primarykey
    data
    text
    <p>What worked for me is: you shouldn't just learn any web framework you hear about, take a look at it, see if it makes you code comfortably, ask around stackoverflow or forums to see its advantages and disadvantages, then learn it and learn it good and just stick with it until you feel its broken or plain outdated. Any of the webframeworks you wrote about is good by itself and a fun to work with if you "REALLY" know what it does. if you don't you are just wandering in a desert with no compass! I've also found the 21 days book is a sure way for you NOT to master a framework or a technology. Docs is surely something to consider while adopting a f/w it also helps if you look around the code yourself (actually this is what helps me the best when I faced with some behavior that I find wierd. </p> <p>1-So why all that hassle with using this frameworks, why not throwing them all away and going back to the roots?</p> <p>if you go back to the roots you rewrite code that does the same thing again and again + most of these f/ws being open source means they are probably better off with maintenance than you would do alone to your own f/w.</p> <p>2-What should I say to my boss when we're starting tomorrow the next project with a new framework again?</p> <p>this is my first time working with this f/w I don't see why should we use this f/w I already know X and I am really good at it. bare in mind the cost of me learning this f/w, the cost of rework that has to be done due to my ignorance of such a f/w. I think we are better off using X, if this is a specific requirement we should fight for it and only do it if we really have to stating the previous notes.</p> <p>Or are there maybe frameworks which really make a difference?</p> <p>only those who address the way you think not the way you write code (think struts at its golden age enforcing the MVC pattern).</p> <p>Or some hidden advantages I have ignored?</p> <p>can't think of any tbh.</p>
    singulars
    1. This table or related slice is empty.
    1. POMaking life better by not using Java web frameworks?
      singulars
      1. PTQuestion
    1. PTAnswer
    1. This table or related slice is empty.
    1. USMahdeTo
    plurals
    1. This table or related slice is empty.
    1. This table or related slice is empty.
    1. This table or related slice is empty.
    1. This table or related slice is empty.
    1. VO
      singulars
      1. PO
      1. This table or related slice is empty.
      1. VTUpMod
    2. VO
      singulars
      1. PO
      1. This table or related slice is empty.
      1. VTUpMod
    1. COMaintainance... Go for those frameworks backed by a specification....
      singulars
      1. PO
      1. USThorbjørn Ravn Andersen
 

Querying!

 
Guidance
A row detail

Detail views are divided into sections. All the information in the data section comes from columns in the selected row. The other sections display data from other, related rows.

Related data can be related in a to-one or a to-many fashion. Captions of data related in a to-many fashion link to a list view showing a filtered view of the table.

Try moving around until you find a non-empty to-many entry and click on the label to get to one. You can move back to the root by clicking on the database name in the header.

SQuiL has stopped working due to an internal error.

If you are curious you may find further information in the browser console, which is accessible through the devtools (F12).

Reload