Databases
StackOverflow2013
Postsdbo
POCode Quality
 

Note that there are some explanatory texts on larger screens.

plurals
  1. POCode Quality
    primarykey
    data
    text
    <p>I work for a software development company and we have around 100 people working on a product, 1/3 of these people are QA. Lately management wants to have a better way to rate individual programmers performance so the suggestion was to use bug reports as a measurement. The more bug reports on a developer the worse he is. This seems ill-advised for more reasons than I can tell e.g. it is a subjective way of measuring, developers work on different projects of differing complexity. In addition if QA is measured for the number of bug reports they generate there will be a lot of discussions about the validity of bug reports.</p> <p>What would be a better way to measure developers performance in such a setting?</p> <p>One suggestion would be to not use bug reports from QA as a measure and instead use bug reports from outside, like beta testers then when such public bug reports are issued also let QA be measured by it.</p> <p>EDIT:#1 After reading some of your excellent responses I was thinking that the general problem with the above described metric is that it is negative reporting bugs - it doesn't encourage producing good quality code.</p> <p>EDIT:#2 I think the problem is that it is two worlds. There are the non-programmers on one side who treat programmers as workers basically, they want metrics loc/minute preferably. Then we have the Programmers, who want to see themselves as artists or craftsmen, "please don't disturb me I am c-o-d-i-n-g" :) I don't think measuring quality can be done by metrics not without being counterproductive. Instead things how a person reacts to bugs, willingness to change, creativity and above all quality of work are important and but mostly not necessarily measurable.</p>
    singulars
    1. PO
      singulars
      1. PTAnswer
    1. This table or related slice is empty.
    1. PTQuestion
    1. USWill
    1. USAnders K.
    plurals
    1. This table or related slice is empty.
    1. This table or related slice is empty.
    1. This table or related slice is empty.
    1. PO
      singulars
      1. PTAnswer
    2. PO
      singulars
      1. PTAnswer
    3. PO
      singulars
      1. PTAnswer
    1. VO
      singulars
      1. POCode Quality
      1. This table or related slice is empty.
      1. VTUpMod
    2. VO
      singulars
      1. POCode Quality
      1. This table or related slice is empty.
      1. VTUpMod
    3. VO
      singulars
      1. POCode Quality
      1. This table or related slice is empty.
      1. VTUpMod
    1. This table or related slice is empty.
 

Querying!

 
Guidance
A row detail

Detail views are divided into sections. All the information in the data section comes from columns in the selected row. The other sections display data from other, related rows.

Related data can be related in a to-one or a to-many fashion. Captions of data related in a to-many fashion link to a list view showing a filtered view of the table.

Try moving around until you find a non-empty to-many entry and click on the label to get to one. You can move back to the root by clicking on the database name in the header.

SQuiL has stopped working due to an internal error.

If you are curious you may find further information in the browser console, which is accessible through the devtools (F12).

Reload