Databases
StackOverflow2013
Postsdbo
POHow to *easily* expose methods of underlying objects?
 

Note that there are some explanatory texts on larger screens.

plurals
  1. POHow to *easily* expose methods of underlying objects?
    primarykey
    data
    text
    <p>Let's say I have some classes defined as follows:</p> <pre><code>class Security { Boolean AuthenticateUser(String username, String password); Boolean AddUser(String username, String password); // many more methods } class NetworkedDevice { void Stop(); void Start(); // many more methods } </code></pre> <p>Then I have another class that contains instances of the above classes. How can I avoid code like the following? I want all the methods of class1 and class2 exposed via this class.</p> <pre><code>class MyWindowsService { Security _security = new Security(); NetworkDevice _netDevice = new NetworkDevice(); Boolean AuthenticateUser(String username, String password) { return _security.AuthenticateUser(username, password); } // all the rest of "Security" methods implemented here void StopNetworkDevice() { _netDevice.Stop(); } void StartNetorkDevice() { _netDevice.Start(); } // all the rest of "NetDevice" methods implemented here } </code></pre> <p><em>Edit</em> I've updated the code to be more <em>real</em> to what I am doing. I am hosting a WCF service within a windows service. The windows service does several things including user authentication and communication to networked devices to name a few. The implementation of my WCF interface calls methods of the "MyWindowsService" class. Exposing the underlying objects as properties is the answer I was looking for. The above class then looks something like:</p> <pre><code>class MyWindowsService { SecurityClass _security = new SecurityClass(); NetworkDevice _netDevice = new NetworkDevice(); Public NetworkDevice NetDevice { get { return _netDevice; } } Public SecurityClass Security { get { return _security; } } } </code></pre>
    singulars
    1. PO
      singulars
      1. PTAnswer
    1. This table or related slice is empty.
    1. PTQuestion
    1. USejwipp
    1. USejwipp
    plurals
    1. This table or related slice is empty.
    1. This table or related slice is empty.
    1. This table or related slice is empty.
    1. PO
      singulars
      1. PTAnswer
    2. PO
      singulars
      1. PTAnswer
    3. PO
      singulars
      1. PTAnswer
    1. VO
      singulars
      1. POHow to *easily* expose methods of underlying objects?
      1. This table or related slice is empty.
      1. VTModeratorReview
    1. COIf you're exposing all of the methods, why not just expose the member?
      singulars
      1. POHow to *easily* expose methods of underlying objects?
      1. USFishBasketGordo
    2. COCan you tell us more about the problem you're trying to solve? There may be a better way...
      singulars
      1. POHow to *easily* expose methods of underlying objects?
      1. USChris Marasti-Georg
 

Querying!

 
Guidance
A row detail

Detail views are divided into sections. All the information in the data section comes from columns in the selected row. The other sections display data from other, related rows.

Related data can be related in a to-one or a to-many fashion. Captions of data related in a to-many fashion link to a list view showing a filtered view of the table.

Try moving around until you find a non-empty to-many entry and click on the label to get to one. You can move back to the root by clicking on the database name in the header.

SQuiL has stopped working due to an internal error.

If you are curious you may find further information in the browser console, which is accessible through the devtools (F12).

Reload