Databases
StackOverflow2013
Postsdbo
PO
 

Note that there are some explanatory texts on larger screens.

plurals
  1. PO
    primarykey
    data
    text
    <p>I would prefer separating the read repository, preferably even change its name to Finder or Reader, the repository is meant for Domain usage not for querying read-only data, you can refer to <a href="https://web.archive.org/web/20160409091216/http://simon-says-architecture.com:80/2011/09/06/ddd-by-the-book/" rel="nofollow noreferrer">this article</a> and <a href="https://web.archive.org/web/20160403195814/http://simon-says-architecture.com/2011/08/23/repository/" rel="nofollow noreferrer">this</a> which explains the usage of Finder separated form repository.</p> <p>I would recommend also the separating of read model from write model architecture <a href="http://martinfowler.com/bliki/CQRS.html" rel="nofollow noreferrer">CQRS</a> and <a href="http://www.udidahan.com/2009/12/09/clarified-cqrs/" rel="nofollow noreferrer">there</a></p> <p>This architecture allows you to separate the read model from write model even in terms of data storage and the use of event sourcing.</p> <p>For a middle solution you can utilize some CQRS concepts without the complexity of separating database by just separating repository from finders, read this <a href="https://web.archive.org/web/20160402212051/http://simon-says-architecture.com/2011/01/23/compromises/" rel="nofollow noreferrer">post</a></p> <p>for a sample of this type of solution (use the same database but separating finders form repositories) check <a href="http://sellandbuy.codeplex.com/" rel="nofollow noreferrer">this sample</a></p>
    singulars
    1. This table or related slice is empty.
    1. POHow do read-only database views fit into the repository pattern?
      singulars
      1. PTQuestion
    1. PTAnswer
    1. This table or related slice is empty.
    1. USMohamed Abed
    plurals
    1. This table or related slice is empty.
    1. This table or related slice is empty.
    1. POHow do read-only database views fit into the repository pattern?
      singulars
      1. PTQuestion
    1. This table or related slice is empty.
    1. VO
      singulars
      1. PO
      1. This table or related slice is empty.
      1. VTUpMod
    2. VO
      singulars
      1. PO
      1. This table or related slice is empty.
      1. VTAcceptedByOriginator
    3. VO
      singulars
      1. PO
      1. This table or related slice is empty.
      1. VTUpMod
    1. COI think this is the best answer. This type of data/objects are nothing to do with the domain, and as Mohamed has pointed out, the term repository is associated with aggregates/domain/transactions, so the use of this term could be misleading. CQRS is aimed at solving this exact issue. I asked a similar question a while back: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/2098112/ddd-how-to-implement-performant-repositories-for-searching
      singulars
      1. PO
      1. USDavid Masters
    2. COGreat answer due to the great links. This helped me view my code from a different and clearer perspective.
      singulars
      1. PO
      1. USLandon Poch
 

Querying!

 
Guidance
A row detail

Detail views are divided into sections. All the information in the data section comes from columns in the selected row. The other sections display data from other, related rows.

Related data can be related in a to-one or a to-many fashion. Captions of data related in a to-many fashion link to a list view showing a filtered view of the table.

Try moving around until you find a non-empty to-many entry and click on the label to get to one. You can move back to the root by clicking on the database name in the header.

SQuiL has stopped working due to an internal error.

If you are curious you may find further information in the browser console, which is accessible through the devtools (F12).

Reload