StackOverflow2013

Note that there are some explanatory texts on larger screens.

plurals

PO
primarykey
Id
6254279
data
AcceptedAnswerId
0
AnswerCount
0
ClosedDate
CommentCount
0
CommunityOwnedDate
CreationDate
2011-06-06T15:24:45.367
FavoriteCount
0
LastActivityDate
2011-06-06T15:24:45.367
LastEditDate
LastEditorUserId
0
OwnerUserId
770413
ParentId
6253987
PostTypeId
2
Score
0
ViewCount
0
LastEditorDisplayName
text
Body
When giving items an absolute positioning, you are automatically assigning that absolute positioning from the next defined container. This container must also have absolute positioning for these child elements to have absolute positioning from the 0,0 position of the parent container. Here is your code (from your page): <pre><code><table height="300" width="575" bordercolor="#000" border="1px" style="position:relative;"> <tr> <td> <img src="Images/Paddle1.JPG" style="position:absolute; top:5px; left:3px;" id="Paddle1" /> <img src="Images/Paddle2.JPG" style="position:absolute; top:5px; left:555px;" id="Paddle2" /> <img src="Images/Ball.JPG" style="position:absolute; top:120px; left:265px;" id="Ball" /> </td> </tr> </table> </code></pre> In order for absolute positioning for the images to work the way you want them to in FF, you'd have to absolutely position the table containing them. While I would suggest you use div layers for containing them, it would appear that in your case you could use an easier approach (albeit frowned upon) by creating three columns in your table and use left alignment on the paddle1's td and right alignment on the paddle2's td... Again, but I'd suggest you write it to use div layers to control layout as that's what's considered "proper" nowadays. <a href="http://reference.sitepoint.com/css/position" rel="nofollow">Here's</a> a handy reference to view on positioning. Basically it's letting you know that the position property is pretty buggy in most browsers. I'm sure it works in IE because, well, there are a lot of odd coding samples that work in IE... It's strange, but always best to do it proper. :)
Tags
Title
singulars
PostAcceptedAnswerId
1. This table or related slice is empty.
PostParentId
1. POMy pong project is not positioning right in FF
 singulars
 PostTypePostTypeId
 PTQuestion
PostTypePostTypeId
1. PTAnswer
UserLastEditorUserId
1. This table or related slice is empty.
UserOwnerUserId
1. USakuta
plurals
PostLinksPostIdRelatedPostId
1. This table or related slice is empty.
PostLinksRelatedPostIdPostId
1. This table or related slice is empty.
PostsAcceptedAnswerId
1. This table or related slice is empty.
PostsParentIdCreationDate
1. This table or related slice is empty.
VotesPostIdCreationDate
1. VO
 singulars
 PostPostId
 PO
 UserUserId
 This table or related slice is empty.
 VoteTypeVoteTypeId
 VTDownMod
2. VO
 singulars
 PostPostId
 PO
 UserUserId
 This table or related slice is empty.
 VoteTypeVoteTypeId
 VTUpMod
CommentsPostId
1. This table or related slice is empty.

Querying!

Guidance

A row detail

Detail views are divided into sections. All the information in the data section comes from columns in the selected row. The other sections display data from other, related rows.

Related data can be related in a to-one or a to-many fashion. Captions of data related in a to-many fashion link to a list view showing a filtered view of the table.

Try moving around until you find a non-empty to-many entry and click on the label to get to one. You can move back to the root by clicking on the database name in the header.