Note that there are some explanatory texts on larger screens.

plurals
  1. POAndroid Honeycomb: How to change Fragments in a FrameLayout, without re-creating them?
    primarykey
    data
    text
    <p>is it possible to switch between Fragments without re-creating them all the time? If so, how?</p> <p><a href="http://developer.android.com/guide/topics/fundamentals/fragments.html#Transactions" rel="nofollow noreferrer">In the documentation</a> I found an example of how to replace Fragments. </p> <pre><code>// Create new fragment and transaction Fragment newFragment = new ExampleFragment(); FragmentTransaction transaction = getFragmentManager().beginTransaction(); // Replace whatever is in the fragment_container view with this fragment, // and add the transaction to the back stack transaction.replace(R.id.fragment_container, newFragment); transaction.addToBackStack(null); // Commit the transaction transaction.commit(); </code></pre> <p>But I don't want to create my Fragments from the scratch every time I need them.</p> <p>I also found <a href="http://developer.android.com/resources/samples/ApiDemos/src/com/example/android/apis/app/FragmentHideShow.html" rel="nofollow noreferrer">this example</a> of hiding/showing Fragments:</p> <pre><code>// The content view embeds two fragments; now retrieve them and attach // their "hide" button. FragmentManager fm = getFragmentManager(); addShowHideListener(R.id.frag1hide, fm.findFragmentById(R.id.fragment1)); addShowHideListener(R.id.frag2hide, fm.findFragmentById(R.id.fragment2)); </code></pre> <p>But how would I create a fragment with an ID outside an XML file? </p> <p>I think this might be related to <a href="https://stackoverflow.com/questions/5908492/android-honeycomb-get-instance-of-fragments">this question</a>, but there isn't an answer. :/</p> <p>Thank you very much in advance, jellyfish</p> <p><strong>Edit:</strong></p> <p>That's how I'm doing it now:</p> <pre><code>Fragment shown = fragmentManager.findFragmentByTag(shownFragment); //... FragmentTransaction fragmentTransaction = fragmentManager.beginTransaction(); if (shown != null) fragmentTransaction.hide(shown); //switch statetement for menu selection, just one example: SettingsFragment set = (SettingsFragment) fragmentManager.findFragmentByTag(SET); Toast.makeText(this, "Settings:" + set, Toast.LENGTH_LONG).show(); if (set == null) { set = new SettingsFragment(); fragmentTransaction.add(R.id.framelayout_content, set, SET); } else fragmentTransaction.show(set); shownFragment = SET; fragmentTransaction.commit(); </code></pre> <p>If I call up the settings, then something else, and then go back to settings, the toast gives me "null" first and "Settings:SettingsFragment{40ef..." second.</p> <p>However, if I replace <code>fragmentTransaction.add(R.id.framelayout_content, set, SET);</code> with <code>fragmentTransaction.replace(R.id.framelayout_content, set, SET);</code> I keep getting "null", "null", "null"... so it doesn't seem to find the Fragment by tag.</p> <p><strong>Edit2:</strong></p> <p>Adding <code>fragmentTransaction.addToBackStack(null);</code> did the trick. :) This saves the whole hiding/memorizing which fragment is shown part so I suppose it's the most elegant solution for this.</p> <p>I found <a href="http://programming-android.labs.oreilly.com/ch08.html#ch08_id36032549" rel="nofollow noreferrer">this</a> tutorial quite helpful on the topic.</p> <p><strong>Edit3:</strong></p> <p>Looking at my code I realized I could get rid of some parts, so I changed it to:</p> <pre><code>FragmentTransaction fragmentTransaction = fragmentManager.beginTransaction(); if (shown != null) fragmentTransaction.hide(shown); Settings set = (Settings) fragmentManager.findFragmentByTag(SET); if (set == null) set = new Settings(); fragmentTransaction.replace(R.id.framelayout_content, set, SET); fragmentTransaction.addToBackStack(null); fragmentTransaction.commit(); </code></pre> <p>However, this invoked an <code>IllegalStateException: Fragment already added</code>, much the same like <a href="https://stackoverflow.com/questions/6250580/fragment-already-added-illegalstateexception">here</a>. Is there an easy way to prevent this? Otherwise I think I might switch back to the hide/show bit.</p>
    singulars
    1. This table or related slice is empty.
    plurals
    1. This table or related slice is empty.
    1. This table or related slice is empty.
 

Querying!

 
Guidance

SQuiL has stopped working due to an internal error.

If you are curious you may find further information in the browser console, which is accessible through the devtools (F12).

Reload