Note that there are some explanatory texts on larger screens.

plurals
  1. PO
    primarykey
    data
    text
    <p>I have tried to search for some results about your issue, so I`v entered the irc (on freenode, #chromium channel) and because <strong>rsleevi</strong> don't have account I just copied our conversation: </p> <p>Me:</p> <blockquote> <p>hey, does anyone knows about Chromium's "--single-process" and localstorage bug ?</p> </blockquote> <p>rsleevi:</p> <blockquote> <p>&lt;+rsleevi> That's a bit of a broad question. But the easy answer is "--single-process" isn't a "supported" flag - it truly is intended for debugging purposes only by devs. If you're using/relying on it for general use, then theres your problem :) &lt;+rsleevi> It's reasonably expected that a number of things won't work or won't work right in --single-process</p> </blockquote> <p>Me:</p> <blockquote> <p>yes I understand that is for debugging pupposes, but I just want to know why localStorage doesn't work well while other stuff does :)</p> </blockquote> <p>rsleevi:</p> <blockquote> <p>&lt;+rsleevi> Well, the answer is because --single-process isn't "supported" :-) [13:58:32] &lt;+rsleevi> The design of new features always designs for the multi-process scenario. If it happens to work in --single-process, serendipity, if not, c'est le vie</p> </blockquote> <p>Me:</p> <blockquote> <p>OK I understand. Just thought maybe there is some "offical why"</p> </blockquote> <p>rsleevi:</p> <blockquote> <p>&lt;+rsleevi> Generally, no, there's not some decision "We don't want to support X in --single-process"... It's "X doesn't happen to work? Oh well"</p> <p>&lt;+rsleevi> If you're using --single-process, realize that (just like the info bar says) you're running without all the nice security features, and your configuration/features are expected to regularly break or be unusable. I really can't stress the "not-supported" aspect enough, in the hope that maybe I can sway you :-)</p> </blockquote> <p>Me: </p> <blockquote> <p>I don't know if you are a memeber on stackoverflow, but I`m trying to help this mate here: <a href="https://stackoverflow.com/questions/5925349/localstorage-isnt-accessible-in-chromes-single-process-mode">localStorage Isn&#39;t Accessible in Chrome&#39;s --single-process Mode</a> , maybe you can answer his question ( if you are a member ) Don't want to take your copyrights :)</p> </blockquote> <p>rsleevi: </p> <blockquote> <p>[14:09:57] &lt;+rsleevi> Heh. I don't have an account, sounds like your mate doesn't want my lecture, but the answer is just like the info bar says "unsupported" :-) marsbear's second answer is right on track - it's just a development aide [14:10:08] &lt;+rsleevi> that is, Chromium development, not general webdev</p> </blockquote> <p>I know that there isn't a fully answer here, but maybe it will help you. </p>
    singulars
    1. This table or related slice is empty.
    plurals
    1. This table or related slice is empty.
    1. This table or related slice is empty.
    1. This table or related slice is empty.
    1. This table or related slice is empty.
    1. VO
      singulars
      1. This table or related slice is empty.
    2. VO
      singulars
      1. This table or related slice is empty.
    3. VO
      singulars
      1. This table or related slice is empty.
 

Querying!

 
Guidance

SQuiL has stopped working due to an internal error.

If you are curious you may find further information in the browser console, which is accessible through the devtools (F12).

Reload