Note that there are some explanatory texts on larger screens.

plurals
  1. PORegex for names with special characters (Unicode)
    primarykey
    data
    text
    <p>Okay, I have read about regex all day now, and still don't understand it properly. What i'm trying to do is validate a name, but the functions i can find for this on the internet only use <code>[a-zA-Z]</code>, leaving characters out that i need to accept to.</p> <p>I basically need a regex that checks that the name is at least two words, and that it does not contain numbers or special characters like <code>!"#¤%&amp;/()=...</code>, however the words can contain characters like æ, é, Â and so on...</p> <p>An example of an accepted name would be: "John Elkjærd" or "André Svenson"<br />An non-accepted name would be: "<strong>Hans</strong>", "H<b>4</b>nn<b>3</b> Andersen" or "Martin Henriksen<b>!</b>"</p> <p>If it matters i use the javascript <code>.match()</code> function client side and want to use php's <code>preg_replace()</code> only "in negative" server side. (removing non-matching characters).</p> <p>Any help would be much appreciated.</p> <p><strong>Update:</strong><br /> Okay, thanks to <a href="https://stackoverflow.com/questions/5963228/regex-for-names-with-special-characters/5963425#5963425">Alix Axel's answer</a> i have the important part down, the server side one.</p> <p>But as the page from <a href="https://stackoverflow.com/questions/5963228/regex-for-names-with-special-characters/5963334#5963334">LightWing's answer</a> suggests, i'm unable to find anything about unicode support for javascript, so i ended up with half a solution for the client side, just checking for at least two words and minimum 5 characters like this:</p> <pre><code>if(name.match(/\S+/g).length &gt;= minWords &amp;&amp; name.length &gt;= 5) { //valid } </code></pre> <p>An alternative would be to specify all the unicode characters as suggested in <a href="https://stackoverflow.com/questions/5963228/regex-for-names-with-special-characters/5963417#5963417">shifty's answer</a>, which i might end up doing something like, along with the solution above, but it is a bit unpractical though.</p>
    singulars
    1. This table or related slice is empty.
    plurals
    1. This table or related slice is empty.
    1. This table or related slice is empty.
 

Querying!

 
Guidance

SQuiL has stopped working due to an internal error.

If you are curious you may find further information in the browser console, which is accessible through the devtools (F12).

Reload