Databases
StackOverflow2013
Postsdbo
PO
 

Note that there are some explanatory texts on larger screens.

plurals
  1. PO
    primarykey
    data
    text
    <p>The problem is with unintended hits rather than missed ones. What you really want to check is if all parts of the ball are covered by some circle, while the check you're doing is if any circle only partially overlaps - but an override if any circle fully covers the ball. </p> <p>I figure for any potential hit point, i.e. closest inner wall of a circle, let that point "walk" along the wall by checking its distance from all other circles. Should it then leave the ball, it was a false hit. </p> <p>First you find the list of circles that touch the ball at all. As before, if any of them cover it, you can skip the rest of the checks. Also find the closest wall point to the ball for the circles. For each of those closest wall points, if it overlaps another circle, move it to the intersection point which is closest to the ball but further away than the current point. Discard it if it's outside the ball. Repeat the procedure for all circles, since more than two may overlap. Also note that the moving of the point may cause it to enter new circles. </p> <p>You could precompute the intersection points and discard any that are a ball radius inside of any other circle.</p> <p>This can surely be improved on, but it's a start, I think. I suspect a bug involving the case when both intersection points of a pair of circles overlap the ball, but a walk chain leads one of them outside the ball. Perhaps the initial collision points should be replaced only by both intersection points, not the closest. </p>
    singulars
    1. This table or related slice is empty.
    1. POPyGame Circular Collision Issues - Circle Interior
      singulars
      1. PTQuestion
    1. PTAnswer
    1. USYann Vernier
    1. USYann Vernier
    plurals
    1. This table or related slice is empty.
    1. This table or related slice is empty.
    1. POPyGame Circular Collision Issues - Circle Interior
      singulars
      1. PTQuestion
    1. This table or related slice is empty.
    1. VO
      singulars
      1. PO
      1. This table or related slice is empty.
      1. VTUpMod
    2. VO
      singulars
      1. PO
      1. This table or related slice is empty.
      1. VTAcceptedByOriginator
    1. COI'm in the process of testing this solution, so here's hoping it works. I'll mark this as correct tonight, hopefully.
      singulars
      1. PO
      1. USnchpmn
    2. COSo how did it go?
      singulars
      1. PO
      1. USYann Vernier
    3. COAh, sorry Yann! Sorry! Here you go, it worked. It still needed a faily comprehensive re-write of my code to get everything working, but yes. XD
      singulars
      1. PO
      1. USnchpmn
 

Querying!

 
Guidance
A row detail

Detail views are divided into sections. All the information in the data section comes from columns in the selected row. The other sections display data from other, related rows.

Related data can be related in a to-one or a to-many fashion. Captions of data related in a to-many fashion link to a list view showing a filtered view of the table.

Try moving around until you find a non-empty to-many entry and click on the label to get to one. You can move back to the root by clicking on the database name in the header.

SQuiL has stopped working due to an internal error.

If you are curious you may find further information in the browser console, which is accessible through the devtools (F12).

Reload