Databases
StackOverflow2013
Postsdbo
POIs there a way to construct an object using a string representation of its constituent parts without using any reflection for this particular step?
 

Note that there are some explanatory texts on larger screens.

plurals
  1. POIs there a way to construct an object using a string representation of its constituent parts without using any reflection for this particular step?
    primarykey
    data
    text
    <p>Let's assume I have some <code>MyObject obj</code> object and want to access a property of that object such as <code>obj.SomeCollection.SomeProperty</code>. Is it possible to get that property on this object by combining obj and .SomeCollection.SomeProperty represented as a string without invoking any of the reflection functions for this particular step?</p> <p>UPDATE: The reason why I'm trying to avoid reflection is because of a huge performance hit. Basically, I will use reflection in order to extract the string reperesentation of its constituent parts and store them in some kind of dictionary which will be reused from that point on, thus avoiding using reflection every time I need an access to object's properties. The reason why I'm so worried about performance is because I need to use this process, if it exists, for enterprise-level system unit tests. With reflection this usage becomes unrealistic as it could take up to an hour to run these tests. Hope this explains my position. </p>
    singulars
    1. PO
      singulars
      1. PTAnswer
    1. This table or related slice is empty.
    1. PTQuestion
    1. USUkraineTrain
    1. USUkraineTrain
    plurals
    1. This table or related slice is empty.
    1. This table or related slice is empty.
    1. This table or related slice is empty.
    1. PO
      singulars
      1. PTAnswer
    2. PO
      singulars
      1. PTAnswer
    1. VO
      singulars
      1. POIs there a way to construct an object using a string representation of its constituent parts without using any reflection for this particular step?
      1. This table or related slice is empty.
      1. VTUpMod
    1. COFrom what you're trying to accomplish, reflection sounds like the perfect tool. Any particular reason you're trying to avoid it?
      singulars
      1. POIs there a way to construct an object using a string representation of its constituent parts without using any reflection for this particular step?
      1. USScott Wegner
    2. COThe reason why I'm trying to avoid reflection is because of a huge performance hit. Basically, I will use reflection in order to extract the string reperesentation of its constituent parts and store them in some kind of dictionary which will be reused from that point on, thus avoiding using reflection every time I need an access to object's property.
      singulars
      1. POIs there a way to construct an object using a string representation of its constituent parts without using any reflection for this particular step?
      1. USUkraineTrain
    3. COHow much of a performance hit, though? Assuming you cache the reflection result, the performance shouldn't be that much slower.
      singulars
      1. POIs there a way to construct an object using a string representation of its constituent parts without using any reflection for this particular step?
      1. USrossisdead
 

Querying!

 
Guidance
A row detail

Detail views are divided into sections. All the information in the data section comes from columns in the selected row. The other sections display data from other, related rows.

Related data can be related in a to-one or a to-many fashion. Captions of data related in a to-many fashion link to a list view showing a filtered view of the table.

Try moving around until you find a non-empty to-many entry and click on the label to get to one. You can move back to the root by clicking on the database name in the header.

SQuiL has stopped working due to an internal error.

If you are curious you may find further information in the browser console, which is accessible through the devtools (F12).

Reload