Databases
StackOverflow2013
Postsdbo
PO
 

Note that there are some explanatory texts on larger screens.

plurals
  1. PO
    primarykey
    data
    text
    <p>I think Google just announced the answer to my question: <a href="http://googlewebmastercentral.blogspot.com/2009/02/specify-your-canonical.html" rel="noreferrer">the <code>canonical</code> link relation for declaring the canonical URL</a>.</p> <p><a href="http://www.google.com/s2/profiles/112810134285899618775" rel="noreferrer">Maile Ohye</a> from Google wrote:</p> <blockquote> <blockquote> <p>MickeyC said...<br> You should have used the Content-Location header instead, as per:<br> <a href="http://www.w3.org/Protocols/rfc2616/rfc2616-sec14.html" rel="noreferrer">http://www.w3.org/Protocols/rfc2616/rfc2616-sec14.html</a><br> "14.14 Content-Location"</p> </blockquote> <p>@MikeyC: Yes, from a theoretical standpoint that makes sense and we certainly considered it. A few points, however, led us to choose :</p> <ol> <li><p>Our data showed that the "Content-Location" header is configured improperly on many web sites. Sometimes webmasters provide long, ugly URLs that aren’t even duplicates -- it's probably unintentional. They're likely unaware that their webserver is even sending the Content-Location header. </p> <p>It would've been extremely time consuming to contact site owners to clean up the Content-Location issues throughout the web. We realized that if we started with a clean slate, we could provide the functionality more quickly. With Microsoft and Yahoo! on-board to support this format, webmasters need to only learn one syntax.</p></li> <li><p>Often webmasters have difficulty configuring their web server headers, but can more easily change their HTML. rel="canonical" seemed like a friendly attribute.</p></li> </ol> </blockquote> <p><a href="http://googlewebmastercentral.blogspot.com/2009/02/specify-your-canonical.html?showComment=1234714860000#c8376597054104610625" rel="noreferrer">http://googlewebmastercentral.blogspot.com/2009/02/specify-your-canonical.html?showComment=1234714860000#c8376597054104610625</a></p>
    singulars
    1. This table or related slice is empty.
    1. PODo search engines respect the HTTP header field “Content-Location”?
      singulars
      1. PTQuestion
    1. PTAnswer
    1. USGumbo
    1. USGumbo
    plurals
    1. This table or related slice is empty.
    1. This table or related slice is empty.
    1. PODo search engines respect the HTTP header field “Content-Location”?
      singulars
      1. PTQuestion
    1. This table or related slice is empty.
    1. VO
      singulars
      1. PO
      1. This table or related slice is empty.
      1. VTAcceptedByOriginator
    2. VO
      singulars
      1. PO
      1. This table or related slice is empty.
      1. VTUpMod
    3. VO
      singulars
      1. PO
      1. This table or related slice is empty.
      1. VTUpMod
    1. COGreat to see the canonical-link support from google!
      singulars
      1. PO
      1. USWalden Leverich
 

Querying!

 
Guidance
A row detail

Detail views are divided into sections. All the information in the data section comes from columns in the selected row. The other sections display data from other, related rows.

Related data can be related in a to-one or a to-many fashion. Captions of data related in a to-many fashion link to a list view showing a filtered view of the table.

Try moving around until you find a non-empty to-many entry and click on the label to get to one. You can move back to the root by clicking on the database name in the header.

SQuiL has stopped working due to an internal error.

If you are curious you may find further information in the browser console, which is accessible through the devtools (F12).

Reload