Databases
StackOverflow2013
Postsdbo
PO
 

Note that there are some explanatory texts on larger screens.

plurals
  1. PO
    primarykey
    data
    text
    <p>In your XAML, set your background to black. Then in your user control, use the DesignerProperties to set the background at runtime:</p> <p><strong>XAML</strong></p> <pre><code>&lt;UserControl .... Background="Black" .... &gt; </code></pre> <p><strong>Code Behind</strong></p> <pre><code>public YourUserControl() { InitializeComponent(); if( !System.ComponentModel.DesignerProperties.GetIsInDesignMode( this ) ) { this.Background = Brushes.Transparent; } } </code></pre> <p><br /></p> <hr> <h2><strong>Alternate Method</strong></h2> <p><strong>UserControl:</strong></p> <p>In your user control, do not declare a background color:</p> <pre><code>&lt;UserControl ... namespaces ...&gt; </code></pre> <p><strong>UserControl Code Behind:</strong></p> <p>In your user control's constructor, use the DesignTime method as above, but check to see if it is Design Mode (opposite check from other method):</p> <pre><code>public YourUserControl() { InitializeComponent(); if( System.ComponentModel.DesignerProperties.GetIsInDesignMode( this ) ) { this.Background = Brushes.Black; } } </code></pre> <p><strong>App.xaml:</strong></p> <p>Finally, in your App.xaml, add a style to set a background color for UserControls:</p> <pre><code>&lt;Application.Resources&gt; &lt;Style TargetType="{x:Type UserControl}"&gt; &lt;Setter Property="Background" Value="Black" /&gt; &lt;/Style&gt; &lt;/Application.Resources&gt; </code></pre> <p>Here's what's happening: </p> <ol> <li>The App.xaml will effect the UserControl at design time because a typed style is applied on an object automatically, but it is <strong>not</strong> applied to a derived object (UserControl in this case). So, at design time, VS thinks it should apply the style, but at runtime, it will be ignored.</li> <li>The <code>GetIsInDesignMode</code> check will effect the UserControl when viewing the control in a Window that is using the UserControl because VS is compiling the UserControl at design time in order to render it in the Visual Designer.</li> </ol> <p>HTH's</p>
    singulars
    1. This table or related slice is empty.
    1. POBlack Background for XAML Editor
      singulars
      1. PTQuestion
    1. PTAnswer
    1. USMetro Smurf
    1. USMetro Smurf
    plurals
    1. This table or related slice is empty.
    1. This table or related slice is empty.
    1. POBlack Background for XAML Editor
      singulars
      1. PTQuestion
    1. This table or related slice is empty.
    1. VO
      singulars
      1. PO
      1. This table or related slice is empty.
      1. VTUpMod
    2. VO
      singulars
      1. PO
      1. This table or related slice is empty.
      1. VTUpMod
    3. VO
      singulars
      1. PO
      1. This table or related slice is empty.
      1. VTUpMod
    1. COHmmm ... quite hacky, but yes, this would work!
      singulars
      1. PO
      1. USColinE
    2. COThis is what I meant, but with proper sample code. +1.
      singulars
      1. PO
      1. USstone
    3. COStill hacky, but at least your alternate method is low effort, +1 and 'tick' - thanks!
      singulars
      1. PO
      1. USColinE
 

Querying!

 
Guidance
A row detail

Detail views are divided into sections. All the information in the data section comes from columns in the selected row. The other sections display data from other, related rows.

Related data can be related in a to-one or a to-many fashion. Captions of data related in a to-many fashion link to a list view showing a filtered view of the table.

Try moving around until you find a non-empty to-many entry and click on the label to get to one. You can move back to the root by clicking on the database name in the header.

SQuiL has stopped working due to an internal error.

If you are curious you may find further information in the browser console, which is accessible through the devtools (F12).

Reload