Databases
StackOverflow2013
Postsdbo
PO
 

Note that there are some explanatory texts on larger screens.

plurals
  1. PO
    primarykey
    data
    text
    <p><strong>tim_yates</strong> wrote:</p> <pre><code>def mock = new MockFor(File) mock.demand.eachFile { [new File("script1.sql"), new File("script2.syn"), new File("script3.grt")].each { (it) } } mock.use { new File('.').eachFile {file -&gt; println "$file" } </code></pre> <p>He was right. As I said, I didn't use Groovy that long(neither Spock).</p> <p>"I'm guessing thats because there isnt direct usage of File.eachFile() in the code(it doesn't pass the mock to the method, it expects the mock to be instantiated in the "use" block)?"</p> <p>The code in the test looks like this:</p> <pre><code>when: mock.use { folderValidator.validate(new File(".")) } then: folderValidator.listMissingFiles.size == 3 </code></pre> <p>The solution was to simply instantiate the mocked class inside the use block. I thought that the mock is instantiated and would be passed in the method - the way Mockito works.</p> <p>Mockito:</p> <pre><code>File pathScripts; pathScripts = mock(File.class); when(pathScripts.list()).thenReturn(listFiles); someObject.someTestingMethod(pathScripts) </code></pre> <p>The proxyInstance way would be to mock the class, <strong>BUT WITH PROPER CONSTRUCTOR ARGUMENTS</strong>!</p> <pre><code>def mock = new MockFor(File) mock.demand.eachFile {func -&gt; [new File("script1.sql"), new File("script2.syn"), new File("script3.grt")].each { func(it) } } def mockProxy = mock.proxyInstance(".") mockProxy.eachFile {file -&gt; println "$file" } </code></pre> <p>And, the biggest mistake was the missing closure in my mocked method:</p> <pre><code>mockFile.demand.eachFile { **??** [new File("script1.sql"), new File("script2.syn"), new File("script3.grt")].each {**?**(it)}} </code></pre> <p>So, thank you, <strong>tim_yates</strong>.</p>
    singulars
    1. This table or related slice is empty.
    1. POMocking groovy new File.eachFile()
      singulars
      1. PTQuestion
    1. PTAnswer
    1. USpfh
    1. USpfh
    plurals
    1. This table or related slice is empty.
    1. This table or related slice is empty.
    1. POMocking groovy new File.eachFile()
      singulars
      1. PTQuestion
    1. This table or related slice is empty.
    1. VO
      singulars
      1. PO
      1. This table or related slice is empty.
      1. VTAcceptedByOriginator
    2. VO
      singulars
      1. PO
      1. This table or related slice is empty.
      1. VTUpMod
    3. VO
      singulars
      1. PO
      1. This table or related slice is empty.
      1. VTUpMod
    1. COThis works since File has a single-parameter constructor. What about multiple-parameter constructors?
      singulars
      1. PO
      1. USDat Chu
    2. COShould work the same? I can't really remember all the details, but I think it should work just fine. I recommend you hide the desired mock behind an interface if you have trouble mocking it. FileFactory interface with the File create(... desired params ...) methods.
      singulars
      1. PO
      1. USpfh
 

Querying!

 
Guidance
A row detail

Detail views are divided into sections. All the information in the data section comes from columns in the selected row. The other sections display data from other, related rows.

Related data can be related in a to-one or a to-many fashion. Captions of data related in a to-many fashion link to a list view showing a filtered view of the table.

Try moving around until you find a non-empty to-many entry and click on the label to get to one. You can move back to the root by clicking on the database name in the header.

SQuiL has stopped working due to an internal error.

If you are curious you may find further information in the browser console, which is accessible through the devtools (F12).

Reload