StackOverflow2013

Note that there are some explanatory texts on larger screens.

plurals

PO
primarykey
Id
502647
data
AcceptedAnswerId
0
AnswerCount
0
ClosedDate
CommentCount
0
CommunityOwnedDate
CreationDate
2009-02-02T09:16:57.757
FavoriteCount
0
LastActivityDate
2011-02-05T14:12:46.577
LastEditDate
2011-02-05T14:12:46.577
LastEditorUserId
341571
OwnerUserId
47020
ParentId
502585
PostTypeId
2
Score
6
ViewCount
0
LastEditorDisplayName
text
Body
Taken from <a href="http://www.ohrner.net/software/tipps_en.php" rel="nofollow noreferrer">this resource</a>, <blockquote> In most cases, if the version control system Subversion's performance is discussed, the topics revolve around the repository backends used (Berkeley DB (bdb) vs. FSFS) and tuning some server software or even hardware parameters. It seems to be less known that the choice of the server variant used - the Apache Subversion mod_dav_svn module or the standalone svnserve server - have a great impact to measured and perceived subversion performance. Usually svnserve is significantly faster than Apache mod_dav_svn In a synthetic, non-representative benchmark test I performed using Subversion 1.4.5, Subversion 1.1.1 and Apache 2.0, mod_dav_svn's performance was 30% to 400% slower than svnserve's. svnserve's performance was close to local direct accesses to the repository using the svn command line tools. The most significant performance penalty was measured during svn log and svn merge operations against the mod_dav_svn server - you'll notice worse svn log performance immediately if eg. using the Eclipse Subversion plugin Subclipse. </blockquote> The author also provides <a href="http://www.ohrner.net/download/sonstiges/krimskrams/svn_bench.csv" rel="nofollow noreferrer">a benchmark</a> comparing the two. I run snvserv that serves about 50 repositories on <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Berkeley_DB" rel="nofollow noreferrer">Berkely DB</a> backends and have had no complaints on the performance. As a side note there are only 10 users, though. I actually found svnserve very easy to install and maintain and doesn't penalise you in lack of futures. SSH can be enabled for svnserve and path based security is also possible if you're the '"one repository, many projects" kind of guy' Steve Robbins talks about :)
Tags
Title
singulars
PostAcceptedAnswerId
1. This table or related slice is empty.
PostParentId
1. POSvnserve VS mod_dav_svn
 singulars
 PostTypePostTypeId
 PTQuestion
PostTypePostTypeId
1. PTAnswer
UserLastEditorUserId
1. USHeidelbergensis
UserOwnerUserId
1. USMartijn Laarman
plurals
PostLinksPostIdRelatedPostId
1. This table or related slice is empty.
PostLinksRelatedPostIdPostId
1. This table or related slice is empty.
PostsAcceptedAnswerId
1. POSvnserve VS mod_dav_svn
 singulars
 PostTypePostTypeId
 PTQuestion
PostsParentIdCreationDate
1. This table or related slice is empty.
VotesPostIdCreationDate
1. VO
 singulars
 PostPostId
 PO
 UserUserId
 This table or related slice is empty.
 VoteTypeVoteTypeId
 VTUpMod
2. VO
 singulars
 PostPostId
 PO
 UserUserId
 This table or related slice is empty.
 VoteTypeVoteTypeId
 VTUpMod
3. VO
 singulars
 PostPostId
 PO
 UserUserId
 This table or related slice is empty.
 VoteTypeVoteTypeId
 VTAcceptedByOriginator
CommentsPostId
1. This table or related slice is empty.

Querying!

Guidance

A row detail

Detail views are divided into sections. All the information in the data section comes from columns in the selected row. The other sections display data from other, related rows.

Related data can be related in a to-one or a to-many fashion. Captions of data related in a to-many fashion link to a list view showing a filtered view of the table.

Try moving around until you find a non-empty to-many entry and click on the label to get to one. You can move back to the root by clicking on the database name in the header.