Note that there are some explanatory texts on larger screens.

plurals
  1. PODoes Visual Studio 2008 Use SvcUtil.exe and if "No" is there any disadvantage to using svcutil?
    primarykey
    data
    text
    <p>After googling a bit there is no definite answer of whether Visual Studio 2008 uses svcutil.exe or not? Visual Studio 2005 did use it, but do the RTM versions of Visual Studio 2008 use svcutil? A few blogs say it doesn't (and make it seem surprising) </p> <ul> <li><a href="http://blog.donnfelker.com/2008/12/02/svcutil-vs2008/" rel="nofollow noreferrer">SVCUtil &amp; VS2008</a></li> <li><a href="http://geekswithblogs.net/DavidBarrett/archive/2008/06/30/equivalent-svcutil.exe-command-for-vs2008-add-service-reference.aspx" rel="nofollow noreferrer">Equivalent svcutil.exe command for VS2008 Add Service Reference</a></li> <li><a href="http://blogs.microsoft.co.il/blogs/oshvartz/archive/2008/09/06/svcutil-generating-wcf-client-and-the-is-field-specified-issue.aspx" rel="nofollow noreferrer">SVCUtil Generating WCF client and the is field specified issue</a></li> </ul> <p>and other sites say it does.</p> <p>The reason I'm asking is we are flattening our WCF wsdl with a custom endpoint behavior extension (an implementation of IWsdlExportExtension/IEndpointBehavior) and using the flattened wsdl via Visual Studio 2008's Add Reference gives us compile errors as it is duplicating Types/Classes. The reference is added without any errors. SvcUtil, on the other hand, throws the duplicate class into a seperate namespace which fixes the build issue.</p> <p>So SvcUtil works, but Visual Studio 2008 doesn't on some of our flatten wsdls. We are fine with continueing to use svcutil if the Add Service Reference in Visual Studio doesn't work, but are wondering if anyone knows if there are any implications in doing so. I couldn't find any evidence that we "shouldn't" be using svcutil, just that it isn't as easy as using the Add Service Reference in Visual Studio 2008.</p>
    singulars
    1. This table or related slice is empty.
    1. This table or related slice is empty.
    plurals
    1. This table or related slice is empty.
    1. This table or related slice is empty.
 

Querying!

 
Guidance

SQuiL has stopped working due to an internal error.

If you are curious you may find further information in the browser console, which is accessible through the devtools (F12).

Reload