Note that there are some explanatory texts on larger screens.

plurals
  1. POproject-tracking tools for navigating with topic maps?
    primarykey
    data
    text
    <p>I'm having trouble with project management &amp; am looking for a good tool that will be a good match for the way my brain works (very associatively). I'd like a bug-tracker but one that I can group tasks into topics and associate the topics to each other in a graph (see the Wikipedia entry on <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Topic_Maps" rel="nofollow noreferrer">Topic Maps</a> ) so that I can find &amp; visualize easily the "big picture". I've tried using AbstractSpoon's <a href="http://www.abstractspoon.com/" rel="nofollow noreferrer">ToDoList</a> and it works well but it's hierarchical and after about 30 or 40 entries I get lost in a maze of things to do.</p> <p>any suggestions?</p> <hr> <p><strong>edit:</strong> I've now tried <a href="http://freemind.sourceforge.net" rel="nofollow noreferrer">Freemind</a>, <a href="http://www.conzilla.org" rel="nofollow noreferrer">Conzilla</a>, <a href="http://www.xmind.net/" rel="nofollow noreferrer">XMind</a>, and <a href="http://vue.tufts.edu/" rel="nofollow noreferrer">VUE</a>. Freemind and Conzilla were a little flaky. XMind seems to be the most polished of the four; they have a "pro" version which is non-free (pay by the month >:( which is weird) but an open-source base version which is free. You can't export the data directly from the program with the free version, but the storage format is just a .jar-style (ZIP file w/ extension .xmind) file that contains a "contents.xml" that is easily parsed if I needed to.</p> <p>@codeslave: </p> <blockquote> <p>but how important is the visual representation any way</p> </blockquote> <p>Visualization is everything! I've got information overload and I need to be able to navigate a mess of information. I don't want it to be super-Powerpoint-polished, but I need to be able to use the associations that I create to remind myself how to find what I'm looking for. In an ideal world you could just full-text search everything, but that only works if you can remember the search phrase. Often I'll file something under "algorithm" and when I go to look for it I look under "programming" instead, or vice-versa. Associativity solves that problem by allowing me to visually browse my "mental model" of the information I've stored.</p>
    singulars
    1. This table or related slice is empty.
    1. This table or related slice is empty.
    plurals
    1. This table or related slice is empty.
    1. This table or related slice is empty.
    1. This table or related slice is empty.
    1. This table or related slice is empty.
 

Querying!

 
Guidance

SQuiL has stopped working due to an internal error.

If you are curious you may find further information in the browser console, which is accessible through the devtools (F12).

Reload