Databases
StackOverflow2013
Postsdbo
POapache rewrite conflict
 

Note that there are some explanatory texts on larger screens.

plurals
  1. POapache rewrite conflict
    primarykey
    data
    text
    <p>I know something's conflicting but being a mod rewrite Muggle it's time to ask for help.</p> <p>I am re-writing <a href="http://test.com/[name]/" rel="nofollow noreferrer">http://test.com/[name]/</a><br> to <a href="http://test.com/script.php?id=[name]" rel="nofollow noreferrer">http://test.com/script.php?id=[name]</a><br> with success, using:</p> <pre><code>(rule#1) RewriteRule ^(.*)\/$ script.php?id=$1&amp;%{QUERY_STRING} [L] </code></pre> <p>Next, I rewrite <a href="http://test.com/[name]/foobar/[key]" rel="nofollow noreferrer">http://test.com/[name]/foobar/[key]</a><br> to <a href="http://test.com/script.php?id=[name]&amp;foobar=[key]" rel="nofollow noreferrer">http://test.com/script.php?id=[name]&amp;foobar=[key]</a><br> also with success, using:</p> <pre><code>(rule#2) RewriteRule ^(.*)\/foobar/([0-9]+)$ script.php?id=$1&amp;foobar=$2 [L] </code></pre> <p>However, when I try to include the query strings,<br> so that <a href="http://test.com/[name]/foobar/[key]?p=[page]" rel="nofollow noreferrer">http://test.com/[name]/foobar/[key]?p=[page]</a><br> could be re-written to <a href="http://test.com/script.php?id=[name]&amp;foobar=[key]&amp;p=[page]" rel="nofollow noreferrer">http://test.com/script.php?id=[name]&amp;foobar=[key]&amp;p=[page]</a><br> with this:</p> <pre><code>(rule#3) RewriteRule ^(.*)\/foobar/([0-9]+)$ script.php?id=$1&amp;foobar=$2&amp;%{QUERY_STRING} [L] </code></pre> <p>then Apache just throws me back to <a href="http://test.com/script.php" rel="nofollow noreferrer">http://test.com/script.php</a>. </p> <p><del>I know from trial and error that rule#3 would work if it did not use the same script.php as rule#1,<br> but I have no idea how to fix it, so any help appreciated!</del></p> <p>Arrgh..after double-checking my rules with Gumbo's examples, I finally found out what went wrong. Although not perfect, my rewrite rules were actually working as intended. However I totally forget that I had another script that checks for valid parameters... apparently, throwing random test values, sometimes is not a good idea. Thanks for the ^/ trick though!</p>
    singulars
    1. This table or related slice is empty.
    1. This table or related slice is empty.
    1. PTQuestion
    1. USjodeci
    1. USjodeci
    plurals
    1. This table or related slice is empty.
    1. This table or related slice is empty.
    1. This table or related slice is empty.
    1. PO
      singulars
      1. PTAnswer
    2. PO
      singulars
      1. PTAnswer
    1. This table or related slice is empty.
    1. This table or related slice is empty.
 

Querying!

 
Guidance
A row detail

Detail views are divided into sections. All the information in the data section comes from columns in the selected row. The other sections display data from other, related rows.

Related data can be related in a to-one or a to-many fashion. Captions of data related in a to-many fashion link to a list view showing a filtered view of the table.

Try moving around until you find a non-empty to-many entry and click on the label to get to one. You can move back to the root by clicking on the database name in the header.

SQuiL has stopped working due to an internal error.

If you are curious you may find further information in the browser console, which is accessible through the devtools (F12).

Reload