StackOverflow2013

Note that there are some explanatory texts on larger screens.

plurals

PO
primarykey
Id
3511936
data
AcceptedAnswerId
0
AnswerCount
0
ClosedDate
CommentCount
0
CommunityOwnedDate
CreationDate
2010-08-18T12:16:21.413
FavoriteCount
0
LastActivityDate
2010-08-18T12:16:21.413
LastEditDate
2017-05-23T12:32:25.003
LastEditorUserId
-1
OwnerUserId
423943
ParentId
1918196
PostTypeId
2
Score
0
ViewCount
0
LastEditorDisplayName
text
Body
There's many similar posts at Stackoverflow: <ul> <li><a href="https://stackoverflow.com/questions/484462/difference-between-i-and-i-in-a-loop">Difference between i++ and ++i in a loop?</a></li> <li><a href="https://stackoverflow.com/questions/467322/is-there-any-performance-difference-between-i-and-i-in-c">Is there any performance difference between ++i and i++ in C#?</a></li> <li><a href="https://stackoverflow.com/questions/24886/is-there-a-performance-difference-between-i-and-i-in-c">Is there a performance difference between i++ and ++i in C?</a></li> </ul> However, it seems your question is more generic because it's not specific to any language or compiler. Most of the above questions deal with a specific language/compiler. Here's a rundown: <ul> <li>if we are talking about C/C++/Java (probably C# too) and a modern compiler: <ul> <li>if <code>i</code> is an integer (<code>const int</code>, <code>int</code>, etc.): <ul> <li>then the compiler will basically replace <code>i++</code> with <code>++i</code>, because they are semantically identical and so it doesn't change the output. this can be verified by checking the generated code / bytecode (for Java, I use the <a href="http://www.ej-technologies.com/products/jclasslib/overview.html" rel="nofollow noreferrer">jclasslib bytecode viewer</a>).</li> </ul></li> <li>else:</li> </ul></li> <li>else: <ul> <li>all bets are off, because the compiler cannot guarantee that they are semantically identical, so it does not try to optimize.</li> </ul></li> </ul> So if you have a class in C++ that overrides the postfix and prefix operators (like <code>std::iterator</code>), this optimization is rarely, if ever, done. In summary: <ul> <li>Mean what you say, and say what you mean. For the increment part of <code>for</code> loops, you almost always want the prefix version (i.e., <code>++i</code>).</li> <li>The compiler switcheroo between <code>++i</code> and <code>i++</code> can't always be done, but it'll try to do it for you if it can.</li> </ul>
Tags
Title
singulars
PostAcceptedAnswerId
1. This table or related slice is empty.
PostParentId
1. POWhy doesn't changing the pre to the post increment at the iteration part of a for loop make a difference?
 singulars
 PostTypePostTypeId
 PTQuestion
PostTypePostTypeId
1. PTAnswer
UserLastEditorUserId
1. USCommunity
UserOwnerUserId
1. USThe Alchemist
plurals
PostLinksPostIdRelatedPostId
1. This table or related slice is empty.
PostLinksRelatedPostIdPostId
1. This table or related slice is empty.
PostsAcceptedAnswerId
1. This table or related slice is empty.
PostsParentIdCreationDate
1. This table or related slice is empty.
VotesPostIdCreationDate
1. This table or related slice is empty.
CommentsPostId
1. This table or related slice is empty.

Querying!

Guidance

A row detail

Detail views are divided into sections. All the information in the data section comes from columns in the selected row. The other sections display data from other, related rows.

Related data can be related in a to-one or a to-many fashion. Captions of data related in a to-many fashion link to a list view showing a filtered view of the table.

Try moving around until you find a non-empty to-many entry and click on the label to get to one. You can move back to the root by clicking on the database name in the header.