Databases
StackOverflow2013
Postsdbo
PO
 

Note that there are some explanatory texts on larger screens.

plurals
  1. PO
    primarykey
    data
    text
    <p>You don't need to run it as a separate thread. </p> <p>When you use <a href="http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/system.diagnostics.process.start.aspx" rel="nofollow noreferrer">Process.Start</a> to launch a process, it is a child process of the current application.</p> <p>Just watch for the <a href="http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/system.diagnostics.process.exited.aspx" rel="nofollow noreferrer">Process.Exited</a> event (making sure to set <a href="http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/system.diagnostics.process.enableraisingevents.aspx" rel="nofollow noreferrer">EnableRaisingEvents</a> to true), and use it to see when the process exits. You can then restart the process automatically at that point.</p> <hr> <blockquote> <p>My theory on how to do this is to create an interface, called ITestBed for example and have the main class in my application implement this. The implementation will contain one method, TestApp(), for example. All I need to do from my test bed application is call this method and this method on the application side can just mirror the constructor of my current object? Will this work?</p> </blockquote> <p>This will work. You can load the main exe's assembly via reflection, and construct the main object, then call your method. Doing this makes the process part of your current application, however - so it has some side effects. You're sharing process memory space in this situation.</p> <p>If you do this, you may want to look into Application Domains. By loading and "launching" your ITestBed implementation in a separate AppDomain, you'll protect your main application.</p>
    singulars
    1. This table or related slice is empty.
    1. PORunning an application as a thread and not a process
      singulars
      1. PTQuestion
    1. PTAnswer
    1. This table or related slice is empty.
    1. USReed Copsey
    plurals
    1. This table or related slice is empty.
    1. This table or related slice is empty.
    1. PORunning an application as a thread and not a process
      singulars
      1. PTQuestion
    1. This table or related slice is empty.
    1. VO
      singulars
      1. PO
      1. This table or related slice is empty.
      1. VTUpMod
    2. VO
      singulars
      1. PO
      1. This table or related slice is empty.
      1. VTAcceptedByOriginator
    3. VO
      singulars
      1. PO
      1. This table or related slice is empty.
      1. VTUpMod
    1. COTo follow up on Reed's answer: it's pretty easy to write an application that will mess up the entire process it's in (even if you isolate it into an AppDomain). The *process* is the proper scope of work for things like this. Visual Studio uses child processes - not threads - for debugging.
      singulars
      1. PO
      1. USStephen Cleary
 

Querying!

 
Guidance
A row detail

Detail views are divided into sections. All the information in the data section comes from columns in the selected row. The other sections display data from other, related rows.

Related data can be related in a to-one or a to-many fashion. Captions of data related in a to-many fashion link to a list view showing a filtered view of the table.

Try moving around until you find a non-empty to-many entry and click on the label to get to one. You can move back to the root by clicking on the database name in the header.

SQuiL has stopped working due to an internal error.

If you are curious you may find further information in the browser console, which is accessible through the devtools (F12).

Reload