Databases
StackOverflow2013
Postsdbo
PO
 

Note that there are some explanatory texts on larger screens.

plurals
  1. PO
    primarykey
    data
    text
    <p>The following is how standard (ISO 14882) explains abort -1 > sizeof(int)</p> <p>Relational operator `>' is defined in 5.9 (expr.rel/2)</p> <blockquote> <p>The usual arithmetic conversions are performed on operands of arithmetic or enumeration type. ...</p> </blockquote> <p>The usual arithmetic conversions is defined in 5 (expr/9)</p> <p>... The pattern is called the usual arithmetic conversions, which are defined as following:</p> <ul> <li>If either operand is of type long double, ...</li> <li>Otherwise, if either operand is dobule, ...</li> <li>Otherwise, if either operand is float, ...</li> <li>Otherwise, the integral promotions shall be performed on both operands.</li> <li>...</li> </ul> <p>The integral promotions is defined in 4.5 (conv.prom/1)</p> <blockquote> <p>An rvalue of type char, signed char, unsigned char, short int, or unsigned short int can be converted to an rvalue of type int if int can represent all the values of the source type; otherwise, the source rvalue can be converted to an rvalue of type unsigned int.</p> </blockquote> <p>The result of sizeof is defined in 5.3.3 (expr.sizeof/6)</p> <blockquote> <p>The result is a constant of type size_t</p> </blockquote> <p>size_t is defined in C standard (ISO 9899), which is <strong>unsigned integer type</strong>.</p> <p>So for <code>-1 &gt; sizeof(int)</code>, the > triggers usual arithmetic conversions. The usual arithmetic conversion converts -1 to unsigned int because int cannot represent all the value of <code>size_t</code>. <code>-1</code> becomes a very large number depend on platform. So <code>-1 &gt; sizeof(int)</code> is <code>true</code>.</p>
    singulars
    1. This table or related slice is empty.
    1. POWhy is −1 > sizeof(int)?
      singulars
      1. PTQuestion
    1. PTAnswer
    1. This table or related slice is empty.
    1. USczchen
    plurals
    1. This table or related slice is empty.
    1. This table or related slice is empty.
    1. POWhy is −1 > sizeof(int)?
      singulars
      1. PTQuestion
    1. This table or related slice is empty.
    1. VO
      singulars
      1. PO
      1. This table or related slice is empty.
      1. VTUpMod
    2. VO
      singulars
      1. PO
      1. This table or related slice is empty.
      1. VTUpMod
    3. VO
      singulars
      1. PO
      1. This table or related slice is empty.
      1. VTUpMod
    1. COIt could just be a typo but `size_t` is _an_ unsigned integer type and it doesn't have to be the case that `int` can't represent all the values of `size_t` (`size_t` might be `unsigned short`), although it obviously can't on the question asker's platform.
      singulars
      1. PO
      1. USCB Bailey
    2. CO`(unsigned T)-1` isn't just a large value, it's *the* largest value `unsigned T` can hold.
      singulars
      1. PO
      1. USGManNickG
    3. COI'm well aware what the standard allows. :) -1 is always the largest, read the conversion rules. Or this http://stackoverflow.com/questions/809227/is-it-safe-to-use-1-to-set-all-bits-to-true/809341#809341
      singulars
      1. PO
      1. USGManNickG
 

Querying!

 
Guidance
A row detail

Detail views are divided into sections. All the information in the data section comes from columns in the selected row. The other sections display data from other, related rows.

Related data can be related in a to-one or a to-many fashion. Captions of data related in a to-many fashion link to a list view showing a filtered view of the table.

Try moving around until you find a non-empty to-many entry and click on the label to get to one. You can move back to the root by clicking on the database name in the header.

SQuiL has stopped working due to an internal error.

If you are curious you may find further information in the browser console, which is accessible through the devtools (F12).

Reload