Databases
StackOverflow2013
Postsdbo
POrails + compass: advantages vs using haml + blueprint directly
 

Note that there are some explanatory texts on larger screens.

plurals
  1. POrails + compass: advantages vs using haml + blueprint directly
    primarykey
    data
    text
    <p>I've got some experience using haml (+sass) on rails projects. I recently started using them with blueprintcss - the only thing I did was transform blueprint.css into a sass file, and started coding from there. I even have a <a href="http://github.com/splendeo/splendeo-generators" rel="noreferrer">rails generator</a> that includes all this by default.</p> <p>It seems that <a href="http://compass-style.org" rel="noreferrer">Compass</a> does what I do, and other things. I'm trying to understand what those other things are - but the documentation/tutorials weren't very clear.</p> <p>These are my conclusions:</p> <ul> <li>Compass comes with <strong>built-in sass mixins</strong> that implement common CSS idioms, such as links with icons or horizontal lists. My solution doesn't provide anything like that. (1 point for Compass).</li> <li>Compass has several <strong>command-line options</strong>: you can create a rails project, but you can also "install" it on an existing rails project. A rails generator could be personalized to do the same thing, I guess. (Tie).</li> <li>Compass has <strong>two modes</strong> of working with blueprint: "basic" and "semantic" usage. I'm not clear about the differences between those. With my rails generator I only have one mode, but it seems enough. (Tie)</li> <li>Apparently, Compass is prepared to use <strong>other frameworks</strong>, besides blueprint (e.g. YUI). I could not find much documentation about this, and I'm not interested on it anyway - blueprint is ok for me (Tie).</li> <li>Compass' learning curve seems a bit stiff and the documentation seems sparse. Learning could be a bit difficult. On the other hand, I know the ins and outs of my own system and can use it right away. (1 point for my system).</li> </ul> <p>With this analysis, I'm hesitant to give Compass a try.</p> <p>Is my analysis correct? Are Am I missing any key points, or have I evaluated any of these points wrongly?</p>
    singulars
    1. PO
      singulars
      1. PTAnswer
    1. This table or related slice is empty.
    1. PTQuestion
    1. USOldTroll
    1. USkikito
    plurals
    1. This table or related slice is empty.
    1. PL
      singulars
      1. LTLinked
    1. This table or related slice is empty.
    1. PO
      singulars
      1. PTAnswer
    2. PO
      singulars
      1. PTAnswer
    3. PO
      singulars
      1. PTAnswer
    1. VO
      singulars
      1. POrails + compass: advantages vs using haml + blueprint directly
      1. USGenba
      1. VTFavorite
    2. VO
      singulars
      1. POrails + compass: advantages vs using haml + blueprint directly
      1. This table or related slice is empty.
      1. VTUpMod
    3. VO
      singulars
      1. POrails + compass: advantages vs using haml + blueprint directly
      1. This table or related slice is empty.
      1. VTUpMod
    1. This table or related slice is empty.
 

Querying!

 
Guidance
A row detail

Detail views are divided into sections. All the information in the data section comes from columns in the selected row. The other sections display data from other, related rows.

Related data can be related in a to-one or a to-many fashion. Captions of data related in a to-many fashion link to a list view showing a filtered view of the table.

Try moving around until you find a non-empty to-many entry and click on the label to get to one. You can move back to the root by clicking on the database name in the header.

SQuiL has stopped working due to an internal error.

If you are curious you may find further information in the browser console, which is accessible through the devtools (F12).

Reload