Databases
StackOverflow2013
Postsdbo
PO
 

Note that there are some explanatory texts on larger screens.

plurals
  1. PO
    primarykey
    data
    text
    <p>[edit:</p> <p>I was thinking, you have 2 cases:</p> <ul> <li>the Home controller is the only one that ever references Product / Articles List user control</li> <li>the user controls are shared by several controllers</li> </ul> <p>In the first case, the view user controls really belong to the home controller and it makes sense to put them in the home controller folder. In the second case, it makes sense to place them in the shared folder since they will be shared by controllers.</p> <p>In either case, maybe you can place them in a sub folder. Like Views/Home/Products and then try RendarPartial("Product/Single") and see what happens? I don't know if it would try to resolve it to: Home/Product/Single and then Shared/Product/Single or not. If sub folders work, it seems to allow the logical seperation of Product and Article, while showing that they are still members of either the Home controller or Shared by all controllers.</p> <p>]</p> <p>Check out this blog entry by Steve Sanderson:</p> <p><a href="http://blog.codeville.net/2008/10/14/partial-requests-in-aspnet-mvc/" rel="nofollow noreferrer">http://blog.codeville.net/2008/10/14/partial-requests-in-aspnet-mvc/</a></p> <p>What you are doing isn't wrong, but it does seem to sort of go against the convention of View/Controller folder names. That said, it makes sense to want to define controller-agnostic view user controls and nesting them seems valid. So I dunno!</p> <p>Anyways, the link just describes a method of instead of using RenderPartial to render a use control, it defines a method of RenderPartialRequest that renders the return value (in your case a user control) of a controller action. So you could add a Product and Articles controller with an Action List that returns your user control, and then call those two actions from the Home/Index view. This seems more intuitive to me, but just an opinion.</p> <p>He also mentions subcontrollers from MVC Contrib, and I'm pretty sure there is desire for something like this to be a part of ASP.NET MVC release.</p>
    singulars
    1. This table or related slice is empty.
    1. POASP.Net MVC and RenderPartial w/ relative paths
      singulars
      1. PTQuestion
    1. PTAnswer
    1. USanonymous
    1. USanonymous
    plurals
    1. This table or related slice is empty.
    1. This table or related slice is empty.
    1. This table or related slice is empty.
    1. This table or related slice is empty.
    1. VO
      singulars
      1. PO
      1. This table or related slice is empty.
      1. VTUpMod
    2. VO
      singulars
      1. PO
      1. This table or related slice is empty.
      1. VTUpMod
    3. VO
      singulars
      1. PO
      1. This table or related slice is empty.
      1. VTUpMod
    1. CORenderPartial("Product/Single") will work for a sub folder in Product View folder. I've just used this technique for some partial views I wish to keep in a sub folder from the rest of the ASPX/ASCX associated with the controller.
      singulars
      1. PO
      1. USRichardOD
 

Querying!

 
Guidance
A row detail

Detail views are divided into sections. All the information in the data section comes from columns in the selected row. The other sections display data from other, related rows.

Related data can be related in a to-one or a to-many fashion. Captions of data related in a to-many fashion link to a list view showing a filtered view of the table.

Try moving around until you find a non-empty to-many entry and click on the label to get to one. You can move back to the root by clicking on the database name in the header.

SQuiL has stopped working due to an internal error.

If you are curious you may find further information in the browser console, which is accessible through the devtools (F12).

Reload