Databases
StackOverflow2013
Postsdbo
PO
 

Note that there are some explanatory texts on larger screens.

plurals
  1. PO
    primarykey
    data
    text
    <p>First off, you have to have legitimate, interesting content and not be some sort of attempt to scam or fool Google (see below). </p> <p>Assuming that's true, Google has some guidelines for getting your site indexed. I highly recommend reading this document. </p> <p><a href="http://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?hl=en&amp;answer=35769" rel="nofollow noreferrer">http://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?hl=en&amp;answer=35769</a></p> <p>The first recommendation is:</p> <blockquote> <p>Make a site with a clear hierarchy and text links. Every page should be reachable from at least one static text link.</p> </blockquote> <p>This means that, yes, you have to have links to each page.</p> <p>My experience is with a bookseller with about 90,000 titles, some of which are rare and hard to obtain elsewhere. Humans will access the books pages through the search interface, mostly. Each book page has a fair amount of information: title, publisher, date published, etc - about 20 fields in all. </p> <p>The site and its ever-changing catalog has been live for more than a decade, but the titles were not accessible to search engines since they were only accessible through the search interface. So google only indexed the CMS pages and not the book catalog. </p> <p>We started by having a site map. This didn't get google to index the book catalog. Then after reading the guidelines we added static text links to all the titles. Then we added accurate meta tags. (The urls remained normal IIS PHP cruft i.e. book.php?id=123546.) There is no duplicate content.</p> <p>At one point we got google to index 17,000 pages, but since then the number of pages in google's index has dropped to about 900 - all the non book pages and a few books that are featured on the site.</p> <p>Unfortunately the client didn't want to pay for us to continue to try to get google to index the titles, so that's how it is today.</p> <p>Finally, it's not really clear from your post what you are trying to accomplish. If you are trying to put an existing, boring old dictionary up on the web and then get ad revenue, Google is going to ignore you.</p>
    singulars
    1. This table or related slice is empty.
    1. POSEO Problem for new dictionary site, google hasn't indexed content
      singulars
      1. PTQuestion
    1. PTAnswer
    1. This table or related slice is empty.
    1. USCharles Dietrich
    plurals
    1. This table or related slice is empty.
    1. This table or related slice is empty.
    1. This table or related slice is empty.
    1. This table or related slice is empty.
    1. VO
      singulars
      1. PO
      1. This table or related slice is empty.
      1. VTUpMod
    2. VO
      singulars
      1. PO
      1. This table or related slice is empty.
      1. VTUpMod
    1. This table or related slice is empty.
 

Querying!

 
Guidance
A row detail

Detail views are divided into sections. All the information in the data section comes from columns in the selected row. The other sections display data from other, related rows.

Related data can be related in a to-one or a to-many fashion. Captions of data related in a to-many fashion link to a list view showing a filtered view of the table.

Try moving around until you find a non-empty to-many entry and click on the label to get to one. You can move back to the root by clicking on the database name in the header.

SQuiL has stopped working due to an internal error.

If you are curious you may find further information in the browser console, which is accessible through the devtools (F12).

Reload