StackOverflow2013

Note that there are some explanatory texts on larger screens.

plurals

PO
primarykey
Id
2525588
data
AcceptedAnswerId
0
AnswerCount
0
ClosedDate
CommentCount
1
CommunityOwnedDate
CreationDate
2010-03-26T17:58:44.653
FavoriteCount
0
LastActivityDate
2010-03-26T17:58:44.653
LastEditDate
LastEditorUserId
0
OwnerUserId
1807555
ParentId
2351427
PostTypeId
2
Score
1
ViewCount
0
LastEditorDisplayName
text
Body
<p>You and everyone else with a brain is asking this question and it's a sticky one. A really good Information Architect thinks in terms of usability, behaviors and flow, although he/she may not even know how to use design tools or be able to draw or program. If they can get an interface into a sketch, the designers can make it pretty. Let the designers do the looky feely STATIC stuff--that's what they are good at. Provide IA with a library of front-end behaviors that they can specify for screen objects. They don't implement this stuff, they only USE it. This is much easier if you use a front end tool such as JQuery, and it's great if you have a front end guru who understands both design & the back end quite well. Separate your javascripts into their own directory and always link them as external files. All the PHP frameworks have methods to do this dynamically. I have toyed with the idea of a config structure that maps files to all the front end stuff that they load so each individual view only loads what it needs. But you are absolutely right: There is a whole nother sub-MVC for the clientside that lives primarily within the views of the overall MVC. I think you can partition off the Ajax stuff (when the view needs to refer back to the server) I document Ajax controller methods as ajax methods and don't call them otherwise. A lot of it is having everyone on your team buy into the division of labor paradigm. It will just cause them to write more decoupled reusable code whatever framework you ultimately choose to hang it on. And you're right, you can do the front end encapslation with all of them, but NONE of them enforce good front end encapsulation, I think that's still in the realm of DYI. Good luck. </p>
Tags
Title
singulars
PostAcceptedAnswerId
1. This table or related slice is empty.
PostParentId
1. PODoes my fat-client application belong in the MVC pattern?
  singulars
  PostTypePostTypeId
  PTQuestion
PostTypePostTypeId
1. PTAnswer
UserLastEditorUserId
1. This table or related slice is empty.
UserOwnerUserId
1. USColleen Dick
plurals
PostLinksPostIdRelatedPostId
1. This table or related slice is empty.
PostLinksRelatedPostIdPostId
1. This table or related slice is empty.
PostsAcceptedAnswerId
1. PODoes my fat-client application belong in the MVC pattern?
  singulars
  PostTypePostTypeId
  PTQuestion
PostsParentIdCreationDate
1. This table or related slice is empty.
VotesPostIdCreationDate
1. VO
  singulars
  PostPostId
  PO
  UserUserId
  This table or related slice is empty.
  VoteTypeVoteTypeId
  VTUpMod
2. VO
  singulars
  PostPostId
  PO
  UserUserId
  This table or related slice is empty.
  VoteTypeVoteTypeId
  VTAcceptedByOriginator
CommentsPostId
1. This table or related slice is empty.

Querying!

Guidance

A row detail

Detail views are divided into sections. All the information in the data section comes from columns in the selected row. The other sections display data from other, related rows.

Related data can be related in a to-one or a to-many fashion. Captions of data related in a to-many fashion link to a list view showing a filtered view of the table.

Try moving around until you find a non-empty to-many entry and click on the label to get to one. You can move back to the root by clicking on the database name in the header.