Databases
StackOverflow2013
Postsdbo
POFirst-time database design: am I overengineering?
 

Note that there are some explanatory texts on larger screens.

plurals
  1. POFirst-time database design: am I overengineering?
    primarykey
    data
    text
    <h1>Background</h1> <p>I'm a first year CS student and I work part time for my dad's small business. I don't have any experience in real world application development. I have written scripts in Python, some coursework in C, but nothing like this.</p> <p>My dad has a small training business and currently all classes are scheduled, recorded and followed up via an external web application. There is an export/"reports" feature but it is very generic and we need specific reports. We don't have access to the actual database to run the queries. I've been asked to set up a custom reporting system. </p> <p>My idea is to create the generic CSV exports and import (probably with Python) them into a MySQL database hosted in the office every night, from where I can run the specific queries that are needed. I don't have experience in databases but understand the very basics. I've read a little about database creation and normal forms.</p> <p>We may start having international clients soon, so I want the database to not explode if/when that happens. We also currently have a couple big corporations as clients, with different divisions (e.g. ACME parent company, ACME healthcare division, ACME bodycare division)</p> <p>The schema I have come up with is the following:</p> <ol> <li><strong>From the client perspective:</strong> <ul> <li>Clients is the main table</li> <li>Clients are linked to the department they work for <ul> <li>Departments can be scattered around a country: HR in London, Marketing in Swansea, etc.</li> <li>Departments are linked to the division of a company</li> </ul></li> <li>Divisions are linked to the parent company </li> </ul></li> <li><strong>From the classes perspective:</strong> <ul> <li>Sessions is the main table <ul> <li>A teacher is linked to each session</li> <li>A statusid is given to each session. E.g. 0 - Completed, 1 - Cancelled</li> <li>Sessions are grouped into "packs" of an arbitrary size</li> </ul></li> <li>Each packs is assigned to a client</li> </ul></li> </ol> <p>I "designed" (more like scribbled) the schema on a piece of paper, trying to keep it normalised to the 3rd form. I then plugged it into MySQL Workbench and it made it all pretty for me:<br> (<a href="http://maian.org/img/schema.png" rel="noreferrer">Click here for full-sized graphic</a>)</p> <p><a href="http://maian.org/img/schema.png" rel="noreferrer">alt text http://maian.org/img/schema.png</a></p> <h2>Example queries I'll be running</h2> <ul> <li>Which clients with credit still left are inactive (those without a class scheduled in the future)</li> <li>What is the attendance rate per client/department/division (measured by the status id in each session)</li> <li>How many classes has a teacher had in a month</li> <li>Flag clients who have low attendance rate</li> <li>Custom reports for HR departments with attendance rates of people in their division</li> </ul> <h1>Question(s)</h1> <ul> <li><strong>Is this overengineered or am I headed the right way?</strong></li> <li>Will the need to join multiple tables for most queries result in a big performance hit?</li> <li>I have added a 'lastsession' column to clients, as it is probably going to be a common query. Is this a good idea or should I keep the database strictly normalised?</li> </ul> <p>Thanks for your time</p>
    singulars
    1. PO
      singulars
      1. PTAnswer
    1. This table or related slice is empty.
    1. PTQuestion
    1. This table or related slice is empty.
    1. USbob esponja
    plurals
    1. This table or related slice is empty.
    1. PL
      singulars
      1. LTLinked
    2. PL
      singulars
      1. LTLinked
    3. PL
      singulars
      1. LTLinked
    1. This table or related slice is empty.
    1. PO
      singulars
      1. PTAnswer
    2. PO
      singulars
      1. PTAnswer
    3. PO
      singulars
      1. PTAnswer
    1. VO
      singulars
      1. POFirst-time database design: am I overengineering?
      1. This table or related slice is empty.
      1. VTUpMod
    2. VO
      singulars
      1. POFirst-time database design: am I overengineering?
      1. USSarfraz
      1. VTFavorite
    3. VO
      singulars
      1. POFirst-time database design: am I overengineering?
      1. This table or related slice is empty.
      1. VTUpMod
    1. CODear first year CS student: please keep using StackOverflow. Your question is interesting, well-written and helpful. In other words, you are in the top 1% of question askers.
      singulars
      1. POFirst-time database design: am I overengineering?
      1. USAdam Crossland
    2. COCan a Division contain other Divisions? IF that is the case a "has" table might be used to link the Division back to the Division it is contained by.
      singulars
      1. POFirst-time database design: am I overengineering?
      1. USMark Schultheiss
    3. COThanks for the kind comments :) Mark I'll have to go over the documentation for this project again, but I don't think we identified that case. Thanks for pointing it out.
      singulars
      1. POFirst-time database design: am I overengineering?
      1. USbob esponja
 

Querying!

 
Guidance
A row detail

Detail views are divided into sections. All the information in the data section comes from columns in the selected row. The other sections display data from other, related rows.

Related data can be related in a to-one or a to-many fashion. Captions of data related in a to-many fashion link to a list view showing a filtered view of the table.

Try moving around until you find a non-empty to-many entry and click on the label to get to one. You can move back to the root by clicking on the database name in the header.

SQuiL has stopped working due to an internal error.

If you are curious you may find further information in the browser console, which is accessible through the devtools (F12).

Reload