Note that there are some explanatory texts on larger screens.

plurals
  1. POHow can HTML5 "replace" Flash?
    primarykey
    data
    text
    singulars
    1. This table or related slice is empty.
    plurals
    1. This table or related slice is empty.
    1. This table or related slice is empty.
    1. CONote that HTML hasn't been as static as you described it for quite some time already. While HTML5 takes it to a new level, "normal" HTML already could do some interesting effects with CSS+JS.
      singulars
    2. COThey've been saying this for years, and trying to "standardize the standards" of the web for more years, yet nothing seems to change. Flash (and Silverlight) solves the cross browser incompatibility problem better than anything else so far. (Not quite cross-platform, but a standard cross-browser platform is certainly better than no standard platform at all.) Meanwhile, the number of competing browsers seems to be increasing, making standardization via vendor dev discipline (hah) even less likely to work. A back-compatible software virtual machine approach like Flash or Silverlight just works.
      singulars
    3. COInstead of trying to eliminate plugins, it's a shame the "HTML5 people" aren't working on standardizing and improving plugin support. If the browser could be transformed into a "platform delivery system" instead of a "content delivery system", we could have many competing (and to users, entirely transparent and auto-installing) web "platforms" such as Flash, Silverlight, JavaFX, and of course various "legacy web" HTML renderers. This would solve all cross-browser and backwards-compatibility issues immediately by putting the platform under the control of a single "platform developer". Oh well..
      singulars
 

Querying!

 
Guidance

SQuiL has stopped working due to an internal error.

If you are curious you may find further information in the browser console, which is accessible through the devtools (F12).

Reload