Databases
StackOverflow2013
Postsdbo
PO
 

Note that there are some explanatory texts on larger screens.

plurals
  1. PO
    primarykey
    data
    text
    <p>While the browser might render it without an issue, certain browsers will render the text-decoration, and get confused by the containing element (in this case, the <code>&lt;li&gt;</code>. This fact is proven by @Matthew Rapati's comment). For example, this is from the MDN article on the issue (borrowed from j08691's answer for completeness):</p> <blockquote> <p>Text decorations draw across descendant elements. This means that it is not possible to disable on a descendant a text decoration that is specified on one of its ancestors.</p> <p>For example, in the markup: <code>&lt;p&gt;This text has &lt;em&gt;some emphasized words&lt;/em&gt; in it.&lt;/p&gt;</code> the style rule: <code>p { text-decoration: underline }</code> would cause the entire paragraph to be underlined. However, the style rule: <code>em { text-decoration: none }</code> would not cause any change; the entire paragraph would still be underlined. (However, the rule <code>em { text-decoration: overline }</code> would cause a second decoration to appear on "some emphasized words".)</p> </blockquote> <p>You should simply place the child <code>&lt;ul&gt;</code> as a sibling, rather than child of the <code>&lt;li&gt;</code>, for example:</p> <pre><code>&lt;ul&gt; &lt;li&gt;bla&lt;/li&gt; &lt;li&gt;bla bla &lt;/li&gt; &lt;ul&gt; &lt;li&gt;bla bla bla&lt;/li&gt; &lt;li&gt;bla bla bla bla &lt;/li&gt; &lt;li&gt;bla bla bla bla bla&lt;/li&gt; &lt;li&gt;bla bla bla bla bla bla&lt;/li&gt; &lt;/ul&gt; &lt;/ul&gt; </code></pre> <p>You should then update your selector as follows:</p> <pre><code>section ul ul li { text-decoration: none !important; } </code></pre> <p>You can see a working <a href="http://jsfiddle.net/337C7/6/" rel="nofollow">jsFiddle Demo</a></p>
    singulars
    1. This table or related slice is empty.
    1. PONot working CSS selector
      singulars
      1. PTQuestion
    1. PTAnswer
    1. USanimuson
    1. USBenM
    plurals
    1. This table or related slice is empty.
    1. This table or related slice is empty.
    1. This table or related slice is empty.
    1. This table or related slice is empty.
    1. VO
      singulars
      1. PO
      1. This table or related slice is empty.
      1. VTUpMod
    2. VO
      singulars
      1. PO
      1. This table or related slice is empty.
      1. VTUpMod
    1. COBut that's invalid HTML?
      singulars
      1. PO
      1. USdavidpauljunior
    2. COI thought the only child of a `<ul>` could be an `<li>`
      singulars
      1. PO
      1. USdavidpauljunior
    3. COCorrect. But as we've highlighted already by the comment from MDN, it's the only way to solve your issue.
      singulars
      1. PO
      1. USBenM
 

Querying!

 
Guidance
A row detail

Detail views are divided into sections. All the information in the data section comes from columns in the selected row. The other sections display data from other, related rows.

Related data can be related in a to-one or a to-many fashion. Captions of data related in a to-many fashion link to a list view showing a filtered view of the table.

Try moving around until you find a non-empty to-many entry and click on the label to get to one. You can move back to the root by clicking on the database name in the header.

SQuiL has stopped working due to an internal error.

If you are curious you may find further information in the browser console, which is accessible through the devtools (F12).

Reload