Databases
StackOverflow2013
Postsdbo
PO
 

Note that there are some explanatory texts on larger screens.

plurals
  1. PO
    primarykey
    data
    text
    <p>The major problem you have got here is, there is no class literal for concrete parameterized type. And that makes sense, since parameterized types don't have any runtime type information. So, you can only have class literal with raw types, in this case <code>Generic.class</code>.</p> <p><strong>Reference:</strong> </p> <ul> <li><a href="http://www.angelikalanger.com/GenericsFAQ/JavaGenericsFAQ.html" rel="nofollow">Java Generics FAQs</a> <ul> <li><a href="http://www.angelikalanger.com/GenericsFAQ/FAQSections/ParameterizedTypes.html#Why%20is%20there%20no%20class%20literal%20for%20the%20concrete%20instantiation%20of%20a%20parameterized%20type?" rel="nofollow">Why is there no class literal for concrete parameterized types? </a>:</li> </ul></li> </ul> <p>Well, that's fine, but <code>Generic.class</code> gives you a <code>Class&lt;Generic&gt;</code> which is not compatible with <code>Class&lt;Generic&lt;T&gt;&gt;</code>. A workaround is to find a way to convert it to <code>Class&lt;Generic&lt;T&gt;&gt;</code>, but that too you can't do directly. You would have to add an intermediate cast to <code>Class&lt;?&gt;</code>, which represents the family of all the instantiation of <code>Class</code>. And then downcast to <code>Class&lt;Generic&lt;T&gt;&gt;</code>, which will remove the compiler error, though you will an unchecked cast warning. You can annotate the constructor with <code>@SuppressWarnings("unchecked")</code> to remove the warning.</p> <pre><code>class Generic&lt;T&gt; extends Abstract&lt;Generic&lt;T&gt;&gt; { public Generic() { super((Class&lt;Generic&lt;T&gt;&gt;)(Class&lt;?&gt;)Generic.class); } } </code></pre>
    singulars
    1. This table or related slice is empty.
    1. POPassing generic subtype class information to superclass in Java
      singulars
      1. PTQuestion
    1. PTAnswer
    1. USRohit Jain
    1. USRohit Jain
    plurals
    1. This table or related slice is empty.
    1. This table or related slice is empty.
    1. This table or related slice is empty.
    1. This table or related slice is empty.
    1. VO
      singulars
      1. PO
      1. This table or related slice is empty.
      1. VTUpMod
    2. VO
      singulars
      1. PO
      1. This table or related slice is empty.
      1. VTUpMod
    3. VO
      singulars
      1. PO
      1. This table or related slice is empty.
      1. VTUpMod
    1. CO+1 for the cast chain. I can't recall seeing that before.
      singulars
      1. PO
      1. USBohemian
    2. CO@Bohemian Even I didn't find myself using it before today itself. IMO, I refrain from framing such a complex generic structure, which would force me to do something like this. In other words, I like to treat my fellow programmer's well. ;)
      singulars
      1. PO
      1. USRohit Jain
    3. COfyi I think I figured out a cleaner way - see my answer
      singulars
      1. PO
      1. USBohemian
 

Querying!

 
Guidance
A row detail

Detail views are divided into sections. All the information in the data section comes from columns in the selected row. The other sections display data from other, related rows.

Related data can be related in a to-one or a to-many fashion. Captions of data related in a to-many fashion link to a list view showing a filtered view of the table.

Try moving around until you find a non-empty to-many entry and click on the label to get to one. You can move back to the root by clicking on the database name in the header.

SQuiL has stopped working due to an internal error.

If you are curious you may find further information in the browser console, which is accessible through the devtools (F12).

Reload