Databases
StackOverflow2013
Postsdbo
PO
 

Note that there are some explanatory texts on larger screens.

plurals
  1. PO
    primarykey
    data
    text
    <p>Here is a solution using <code>plyr</code> with a simulated dataset.</p> <pre><code>library(plyr) set.seed(1001) dat = data.frame(matrix(rnorm(1000), ncol = 10), treatment = sample(c("control", "control", "treatment"), 100, replace = T) ) # divide data set into training and test sets tr_prop = 0.5 # proportion of full dataset to use for training training_set = ddply(dat, .(treatment), function(., seed) { set.seed(seed); .[sample(1:nrow(.), trunc(nrow(.) * tr_prop)), ] }, seed = 101) test_set = ddply(dat, .(treatment), function(., seed) { set.seed(seed); .[-sample(1:nrow(.), trunc(nrow(.) * tr_prop)), ] }, seed = 101) # check that proportions are equal across datasets ddply(dat, .(treatment), function(.) nrow(.)/nrow(dat) ) ddply(training_set, .(treatment), function(.) nrow(.)/nrow(training_set) ) ddply(test_set, .(treatment), function(.) nrow(.)/nrow(test_set) ) c(nrow(training_set), nrow(test_set), nrow(dat)) # lengths of sets </code></pre> <p>Here, I use <code>set.seed()</code> to ensure identical behavior of <code>sample()</code> when constructing the training/test sets with <code>ddply</code>. This strikes me as a bit of a hack; perhaps there is another way to achieve the same result using a single call to <code>**ply</code> (but returning two dataframes). Another option (without egregious use of <code>set.seed</code>) would be to use <code>dlply</code> and then piece together elements of the resulting list into training/test sets:</p> <pre><code>set.seed(101) # for consistancy with 'ddply' above split_set = dlply(dat, .(treatment), function(.) { s = sample(1:nrow(.), trunc(nrow(.) * tr_prop)); list(.[s, ], .[-s,]) } ) # join together with ldply() training_set = ldply(split_set, function(.) .[[1]]) test_set = ldply(split_set, function(.) .[[2]]) </code></pre>
    singulars
    1. This table or related slice is empty.
    1. POTraining and test set with respect to group affiliation
      singulars
      1. PTQuestion
    1. PTAnswer
    1. USNate Pope
    1. USNate Pope
    plurals
    1. This table or related slice is empty.
    1. This table or related slice is empty.
    1. POTraining and test set with respect to group affiliation
      singulars
      1. PTQuestion
    1. This table or related slice is empty.
    1. VO
      singulars
      1. PO
      1. This table or related slice is empty.
      1. VTAcceptedByOriginator
    1. COThanks for the answer, I think it works fine. However for some reasons the rownames of my data set are replaced with numbers and as the result I don't know what samples are used in each training and test set. Do you have any suggestions about why that is so ? Thanks.
      singulars
      1. PO
      1. USPayam Delfani
    2. COI believe this happens because `ddply` creates an entirely new dataframe with the results of the function. I would just add a new column with your sample IDs to the original data, and pass to `ddply` or `dlply` as above.
      singulars
      1. PO
      1. USNate Pope
    3. COThanks. But, the original data contains sample IDs (S01-S100) but they are replaced by numbers as I pass to ddply.
      singulars
      1. PO
      1. USPayam Delfani
 

Querying!

 
Guidance
A row detail

Detail views are divided into sections. All the information in the data section comes from columns in the selected row. The other sections display data from other, related rows.

Related data can be related in a to-one or a to-many fashion. Captions of data related in a to-many fashion link to a list view showing a filtered view of the table.

Try moving around until you find a non-empty to-many entry and click on the label to get to one. You can move back to the root by clicking on the database name in the header.

SQuiL has stopped working due to an internal error.

If you are curious you may find further information in the browser console, which is accessible through the devtools (F12).

Reload