Databases
StackOverflow2013
Postsdbo
PO.Net Application Variables bleeding across applications
 

Note that there are some explanatory texts on larger screens.

plurals
  1. PO.Net Application Variables bleeding across applications
    primarykey
    data
    text
    <p>I have a couple of websites that have a shared code base as they are essentially the same website, except one is for the UK market and the other is for the US market. As well as sharing a code base, they also share a database with a very basic CMS so that each website can have some different content.</p> <p>On the sites we have an admin page which can be used to set some HttpContext.Current.Application variables for each website, things that don't change all that often, but that we may want to change at a moments notice without having to update config files etc.</p> <p>Now this has been working fine for a number of years now on a server 2003 box with IIS 6. Just yesterday we upgraded to a shiny new Server 2012 box with IIS 8 and we are now having issues with the Application objects.</p> <p>To cut a long story short, now when an application variable is set on one website, it is being set across both sites, so the UK market sees the US application objects and vice versa, depending on which one was set last. </p> <p>The application objects are pulled from a database based on a market code, and that is all working fine (the code hasn't changed in at least a couple of years now), and I have written some logging to confirm that the correct objects are being loaded for each website.</p> <p>Each website has its own application pool, so I really can't see how this is happening. I have tested the sites on Server 2008 with IIS 7.5 and they behave fine there, similarly, I run a Windows 8 dev machine with IIS 8 with what I think is an identical setup to the new live servers (the app pools are configured the same and everything) and both sites do the correct thing there.</p> <p>Has anyone ever heard of this sort of issue before, and does anyone have any suggestions for things I can look into to fix this? I thought it wasn't even possible to share Application objects across separate applications, are my assumptions wrong there?</p> <p>Many thanks!</p> <p>Mark</p>
    singulars
    1. This table or related slice is empty.
    1. This table or related slice is empty.
    1. PTQuestion
    1. This table or related slice is empty.
    1. USMark Johnson
    plurals
    1. This table or related slice is empty.
    1. This table or related slice is empty.
    1. This table or related slice is empty.
    1. PO
      singulars
      1. PTAnswer
    2. PO
      singulars
      1. PTAnswer
    1. This table or related slice is empty.
    1. COTo be clear, this is about plain use of `Application[]`, not about some caching or 3rd party lib? Which framework version(s) ?
      singulars
      1. PO.Net Application Variables bleeding across applications
      1. USHenk Holterman
    2. COYes, you're correct I was talking about the use of Application[], and it was in .Net 3.5
      singulars
      1. PO.Net Application Variables bleeding across applications
      1. USMark Johnson
 

Querying!

 
Guidance
A row detail

Detail views are divided into sections. All the information in the data section comes from columns in the selected row. The other sections display data from other, related rows.

Related data can be related in a to-one or a to-many fashion. Captions of data related in a to-many fashion link to a list view showing a filtered view of the table.

Try moving around until you find a non-empty to-many entry and click on the label to get to one. You can move back to the root by clicking on the database name in the header.

SQuiL has stopped working due to an internal error.

If you are curious you may find further information in the browser console, which is accessible through the devtools (F12).

Reload