StackOverflow2013

Note that there are some explanatory texts on larger screens.

plurals

PO
primarykey
Id
18810619
data
AcceptedAnswerId
0
AnswerCount
0
ClosedDate
CommentCount
0
CommunityOwnedDate
CreationDate
2013-09-15T08:54:24.953
FavoriteCount
0
LastActivityDate
2013-09-15T09:28:00.043
LastEditDate
2013-09-15T09:28:00.043
LastEditorUserId
686184
OwnerUserId
686184
ParentId
18810380
PostTypeId
2
Score
0
ViewCount
0
LastEditorDisplayName
text
Body
Maybe you should realize that what you're trying to do is impossible, given the current browser implementation and hardware. On my computer the time it takes for Chrome to repaint a 3x16 area on the screen is about 300 ms. To have 1000 such updates it would take 5 minutes. You want to do it one second. You are clearly asking too much from your hardware. If you really need that much performance (as if...) inside a webbrowser, you should write a native plugin, still I doubt you will be able to redraw a part of your screen that many times a second (at least you would need a 1000hz monitor, which would be silly to produce). Rethink your application logic: even if you show a millisecond clock, the human eye can't see anything that changes faster than 72 times in a second, so you could as well update your clock a more reasonable ~25 times a second and no one would be able to see the difference. It would still be a website I wouldn't want use, because it would slow down my browser, but at least it will not freeze. Using a number which doesn't have 2 and 5 factors will ensure that last digit shown won't repeat too often <pre><code>setInterval("showClock()", 37); </code></pre> Edit: There's a bigger issue in your code, as pointed out by Shadow Wizard, that is you are calling setInterval every time you update your clock, which sets up a lot of timers, as fast as possible. You should be calling that function only once, for example in the onload event: <pre><code><body onload="startClock()"> </code></pre> and then add the <code>startClock</code> function: <pre><code>function startClock() { setInterval("showClock()", 1); } </code></pre> and remove the <code>setInterval</code> call from <code>showClock</code>: <pre><code>function showClock() { var now = new Date; time = fill(now.getHours()) + " : " + fill(now.getMinutes()) + " : " + fill(now.getSeconds()) + " : " + fill(now.getMilliseconds()); document.getElementById("clock").innerHTML = time; // remove! //setTimeout("showClock()",1); } </code></pre> I am still suggesting that you should not need to update your page that often, but that's your call.
Tags
Title
singulars
PostAcceptedAnswerId
1. This table or related slice is empty.
PostParentId
1. POHTML body onload() property
 singulars
 PostTypePostTypeId
 PTQuestion
PostTypePostTypeId
1. PTAnswer
UserLastEditorUserId
1. USpqnet
UserOwnerUserId
1. USpqnet
plurals
PostLinksPostIdRelatedPostId
1. This table or related slice is empty.
PostLinksRelatedPostIdPostId
1. This table or related slice is empty.
PostsAcceptedAnswerId
1. This table or related slice is empty.
PostsParentIdCreationDate
1. This table or related slice is empty.
VotesPostIdCreationDate
1. This table or related slice is empty.
CommentsPostId
1. This table or related slice is empty.

Querying!

Guidance

A row detail

Detail views are divided into sections. All the information in the data section comes from columns in the selected row. The other sections display data from other, related rows.

Related data can be related in a to-one or a to-many fashion. Captions of data related in a to-many fashion link to a list view showing a filtered view of the table.

Try moving around until you find a non-empty to-many entry and click on the label to get to one. You can move back to the root by clicking on the database name in the header.