Databases
StackOverflow2013
Postsdbo
POAll pushed back values in vector changing to default value
 

Note that there are some explanatory texts on larger screens.

plurals
  1. POAll pushed back values in vector changing to default value
    primarykey
    data
    text
    <p>In an effort to reduce multiple functions (that were nearly identical) in my code, I decided to consolidate them all into one function which takes an additional parameter (a class with multiple parameters, actually), and then uses those values to imitate what the multiple functions would have done. Then, long story short, I put each of those class declarations into a vector, and now my program seems dysfunctional.</p> <p>My multiple instances of a class:</p> <pre><code>FragmentCostParameters commonFCP = FragmentCostParameters(.05, 0); FragmentCostParameters rareFCP = FragmentCostParameters(.05, 50); FragmentCostParameters uniqueFCP = FragmentCostParameters(.05, 125); FragmentCostParameters legendaryFCP = FragmentCostParameters(.02, 175); FragmentCostParameters crystallineFCP = FragmentCostParameters(.02, 250); FragmentCostParameters superEliteFCP = FragmentCostParameters(.02, 300); </code></pre> <p>Which get placed into a vector by: </p> <pre><code>vector&lt;FragmentCostParameters&gt; FCPs(6); FCPs.push_back(FragmentCostParameters(.05, 0)); FCPs.push_back(FragmentCostParameters(.05, 50)); FCPs.push_back(FragmentCostParameters(.05, 125)); FCPs.push_back(FragmentCostParameters(.02, 175)); FCPs.push_back(FragmentCostParameters(.02, 250)); FCPs.push_back(FragmentCostParameters(.02, 300)); </code></pre> <p>Additionally, that class is defined below:</p> <pre><code>class FragmentCostParameters { public: double multFactor; double subtractFactor; FragmentCostParameters(double _multFactor, double _subtractFactor){ multFactor = _multFactor; subtractFactor = _subtractFactor; } FragmentCostParameters(){ multFactor = .05; subtractFactor = 0; } }; </code></pre> <p>Now, you'll notice that the default constructor for the <code>FragmentCostParameters</code> involves setting <code>multFactor = .05</code> and <code>subtractFactor = 0</code>. However, it seems that no matter what I push back, each of the values in my vector become mutated into those values. At least, that's what VS 2011 tells me the values are equal to when I'm looking at them in a local scope in the following function (which is the only place they're used).</p> <pre><code>int FragmentCost(double skillLevel, int duration, FragmentCostParameters FCP){ return max((int)(ceil(FCP.multFactor*(skillLevel-FCP.subtractFactor))*ceil(duration/30.0)) , 0); } </code></pre> <p>And the only place that FragmentCost is called is from this function below, which is <em>supposed</em> to pass different values .. but somewhere in the process, when I look at locals in FragmentCost, they're always the default values in the constructor for the class.</p> <pre><code>//given a skill level + duration, will return an array with the fragment usage int* regularTotalFragCost(int skillLevel, int duration){ int fragments[7] = {0,0,0,0,0,0,0}; fragments[0]+= FragmentCost(skillLevel,duration, FCPs[0]); fragments[1]+= FragmentCost(skillLevel,duration, FCPs[0]); fragments[0]+= FragmentCost(skillLevel,duration, FCPs[1]); fragments[2]+= FragmentCost(skillLevel,duration, FCPs[1]); fragments[0]+= FragmentCost(skillLevel,duration, FCPs[2]); fragments[3]+= FragmentCost(skillLevel,duration, FCPs[2]); fragments[0]+= FragmentCost(skillLevel,duration, FCPs[3]); fragments[4]+= FragmentCost(skillLevel,duration, FCPs[3]); fragments[0]+= FragmentCost(skillLevel,duration, FCPs[4]); fragments[5]+= FragmentCost(skillLevel,duration, FCPs[4]); fragments[0]+= FragmentCost(skillLevel,duration, FCPs[5]); fragments[6]+= FragmentCost(skillLevel,duration, FCPs[5]); return fragments; } </code></pre> <p>For some reason I feel that I'm making a really stupid mistake somewhere, but for the life of me I can't seem to figure it out. I would appreciate any help and/or advice anyone could offer.</p> <p>EDIT: Here's what the values for <code>fragments[]</code> in <code>regularTotalFragCost</code> are <em>supposed</em> to be if everything is working correctly, using a couple test values (<code>skillLevel = 250</code> and <code>duration = 30</code>)</p> <pre><code>FCPs[0] : Fragments: 13, 13, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, FCPs[1] : Fragments: 17, 15, 2, 0, 0, 0, 0, FCPs[2] : Fragments: 20, 14, 5, 1, 0, 0, 0, FCPs[3] : Fragments: 29, 14, 9, 5, 1, 0, 0, FCPs[4] : Fragments: 32, 13, 10, 7, 2, 0, 0, FCPs[5] : Fragments: 32, 13, 10, 7, 2, 0, 0, </code></pre> <p>And here is what they are as of right now:</p> <pre><code>FCPs[0] : Fragments: 78, 13, 13, 13, 13, 13, 13, FCPs[1] : Fragments: 78, 13, 13, 13, 13, 13, 13, FCPs[2] : Fragments: 78, 13, 13, 13, 13, 13, 13, FCPs[3] : Fragments: 78, 13, 13, 13, 13, 13, 13, FCPs[4] : Fragments: 78, 13, 13, 13, 13, 13, 13, FCPs[5] : Fragments: 78, 13, 13, 13, 13, 13, 13, </code></pre>
    singulars
    1. PO
      singulars
      1. PTAnswer
    1. This table or related slice is empty.
    1. PTQuestion
    1. USVasu
    1. USVasu
    plurals
    1. This table or related slice is empty.
    1. This table or related slice is empty.
    1. This table or related slice is empty.
    1. PO
      singulars
      1. PTAnswer
    2. PO
      singulars
      1. PTAnswer
    3. PO
      singulars
      1. PTAnswer
    1. This table or related slice is empty.
    1. COHave you tried printing the values stored in the vector to see if that is the case? Have you provided a copy constructor that you did not copy in the question and sets the values to those constants?
      singulars
      1. POAll pushed back values in vector changing to default value
      1. USDavid Rodríguez - dribeas
 

Querying!

 
Guidance
A row detail

Detail views are divided into sections. All the information in the data section comes from columns in the selected row. The other sections display data from other, related rows.

Related data can be related in a to-one or a to-many fashion. Captions of data related in a to-many fashion link to a list view showing a filtered view of the table.

Try moving around until you find a non-empty to-many entry and click on the label to get to one. You can move back to the root by clicking on the database name in the header.

SQuiL has stopped working due to an internal error.

If you are curious you may find further information in the browser console, which is accessible through the devtools (F12).

Reload