StackOverflow2013

Note that there are some explanatory texts on larger screens.

plurals

PO
primarykey
Id
18629244
data
AcceptedAnswerId
0
AnswerCount
0
ClosedDate
CommentCount
1
CommunityOwnedDate
CreationDate
2013-09-05T06:30:46.397
FavoriteCount
0
LastActivityDate
2013-09-05T06:30:46.397
LastEditDate
LastEditorUserId
0
OwnerUserId
22656
ParentId
18629056
PostTypeId
2
Score
3
ViewCount
0
LastEditorDisplayName
text
Body
Marcin has nailed it for the specific transformation you're talking about here, with the <code>using</code> statement. However, you should also be aware of tools like <a href="http://www.red-gate.com/products/dotnet-development/reflector/" rel="nofollow noreferrer">Reflector</a> and <a href="http://www.jetbrains.com/decompiler/" rel="nofollow noreferrer">dotPeek</a> (there are many more) as well as <a href="http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/f7dy01k1.aspx" rel="nofollow noreferrer">ildasm</a>. Reflector and dotPeek will decompile your code back from the compiled code to C#, with various levels of "optimization" (how hard it tries to do the C# compiler's transformation, basically) and they also allow you to see the IL - which is what <code>ildasm</code> gives you too. The IL gives you the ultimate answer about what the compiled code looks like, but often looking at the decompiled code (particularly with "optimizations" turned off, or setting the decompiler to provide C# 2 code for example) can be simpler. It's worth being aware that many of the transformations performed by the compiler will use "unspeakable names" for extra types, fields and methods that are generated. For example if you have: <pre><code>Action foo = () => Console.WriteLine("I'm a lambda!"); </code></pre> then that may generate a method called something like <code><Main>b__0</code>. You wouldn't be able to refer to this in normal C# (as a C# identifier can't include <code><</code> or <code>></code>) but it's valid IL.
Tags
Title
singulars
PostAcceptedAnswerId
1. This table or related slice is empty.
PostParentId
1. POPossibility to see an internal implementation of type T in c#
 singulars
 PostTypePostTypeId
 PTQuestion
PostTypePostTypeId
1. PTAnswer
UserLastEditorUserId
1. This table or related slice is empty.
UserOwnerUserId
1. USJon Skeet
plurals
PostLinksPostIdRelatedPostId
1. This table or related slice is empty.
PostLinksRelatedPostIdPostId
1. This table or related slice is empty.
PostsAcceptedAnswerId
1. This table or related slice is empty.
PostsParentIdCreationDate
1. This table or related slice is empty.
VotesPostIdCreationDate
1. VO
 singulars
 PostPostId
 PO
 UserUserId
 This table or related slice is empty.
 VoteTypeVoteTypeId
 VTUpMod
2. VO
 singulars
 PostPostId
 PO
 UserUserId
 This table or related slice is empty.
 VoteTypeVoteTypeId
 VTUpMod
3. VO
 singulars
 PostPostId
 PO
 UserUserId
 This table or related slice is empty.
 VoteTypeVoteTypeId
 VTUpMod
CommentsPostId
1. COclear and thanks for the line "You wouldn't be able to refer to this in normal c# (as a C# identifier cant include < or > but it's valid Intermediate language"..
 singulars
 PostPostId
 PO
 UserUserId
 USnow he who must not be named.

Querying!

Guidance

A row detail

Detail views are divided into sections. All the information in the data section comes from columns in the selected row. The other sections display data from other, related rows.

Related data can be related in a to-one or a to-many fashion. Captions of data related in a to-many fashion link to a list view showing a filtered view of the table.

Try moving around until you find a non-empty to-many entry and click on the label to get to one. You can move back to the root by clicking on the database name in the header.