Note that there are some explanatory texts on larger screens.

plurals
  1. POGoogle Plus Interactive Posts not displayed on any stream (Client side API)
    primarykey
    data
    text
    <p>As the title denotes, looking for insight on reasons why an <strong>Interactive Post</strong> doesn't show up on any stream (user sharing the post, and to whomever the user is sharing it with).</p> <h2>Brief</h2> <ul> <li>Implement client side api of G+ interactive posts</li> <li>This <em>seems</em> successful <ul> <li>application auth is requested and if granted is displayed in user's "<a href="https://plus.google.com/apps" rel="nofollow noreferrer">applications list</a>"</li> <li>intended content, prefill text, etc. are all displayed when the trigger to initiate the share is invoked</li> <li>no error indicators (that I know of) are displayed when the "Share" button is clicked by the user (the act of actually posting the share).</li> <li>it is <strong>visible</strong> in some way <em>only</em> to Google - explained below</li> </ul></li> </ul> <h2>Findings</h2> <ul> <li><p>It seems Google is blocking the post because even though the share isn't posted on any stream (origin nor target), I received a warning about violating Google policies as displayed below, indicating that the (http) post was sent/submitted... <img src="https://i.stack.imgur.com/CX81S.gif" alt="screen shot of warning display"></p></li> <li><p>further inspection of network activity also displays what <em>looks like</em> (a guess on my part) a <em>spam score</em> (of 8), somehow <em>already</em> pre-determined (another guess on my part): <code>https://apis.google.com/u/0/_/sharebox/post/?spam=8&amp;hl=en&amp;ozv=...</code></p></li> </ul> <h2>Questions</h2> <ul> <li><p>Primary question is why would interactive posts not appear on stream? Any debugging tool out there?</p></li> <li><p><strong>IF</strong> my guess on spam blocking is accurate, then why would such be the case? For <em>interactive posts</em> (which somehow inherently is a case of some user "promoting" something in the first place) - eg: with a "BUY" <code>calltoactionlabel</code>?</p></li> <li><p><strong>IF</strong> my other guess on the content being "pre-tagged" as spam, how/why would that occur. I didn't include it above, but it is a "product page" - the idea of it, which isn't new nor revolutionary, is to give the opportunity for a user to "share" an item he/she just purchased, say in a normal checkout flow?</p></li> <li><p>It's my <em>assumption</em> that implementation was done correctly, no errors reported, etc. - or perhaps it wasn't? Though it seems unlikely, it's "grasping at straws" time..</p></li> </ul> <p>Further testing/debugging seems unwise given the warning of policy violation - and yes, I've stopped further dev on this to prevent harming my accounts (one personal, one work, both used above for testing this API).</p> <p>Thanks for any assistance/input.</p> <p>Note: I've posted this on <a href="https://plus.google.com/u/0/communities/113527920160449995981" rel="nofollow noreferrer">G+ community</a> (no luck so far) so once this is resolved I'll share the answer there too (or vice versa).</p>
    singulars
    1. This table or related slice is empty.
    1. This table or related slice is empty.
    1. This table or related slice is empty.
    plurals
    1. This table or related slice is empty.
    1. This table or related slice is empty.
    1. This table or related slice is empty.
    1. This table or related slice is empty.
    1. This table or related slice is empty.
 

Querying!

 
Guidance

SQuiL has stopped working due to an internal error.

If you are curious you may find further information in the browser console, which is accessible through the devtools (F12).

Reload