StackOverflow2013

Note that there are some explanatory texts on larger screens.

plurals

PO
primarykey
Id
18270637
data
AcceptedAnswerId
0
AnswerCount
0
ClosedDate
CommentCount
0
CommunityOwnedDate
CreationDate
2013-08-16T09:56:01.790
FavoriteCount
0
LastActivityDate
2013-08-16T09:56:01.790
LastEditDate
LastEditorUserId
0
OwnerUserId
2677688
ParentId
18242559
PostTypeId
2
Score
1
ViewCount
0
LastEditorDisplayName
text
Body
To answer the questions that you asked in your post: 1) It is possible to run a JavaScript benchmark when a person first loads your site that will test their capacity for CSS/JavaScript animation speeds, but it will sacrifice several resources. You have to consider the people who will be accessing your site. If they're going to be accessing your site via a mobile device, the last thing you want to do is bring their device to a standstill and either freeze their browser or bump other apps out of memory. You don't want either a desktop or mobile user to think that the site is unresponsive. 2) One of the issues with waiting a few seconds after the page has loaded is that, depending on what you want to do with the site, people will start to try to scroll through your content. If they start to scroll and realize that the site is "stuttering", they may think that something is wrong with their device. Another caveat is that if you want the smoothest animations possible, you may end up using requestAnimationFrame (see <a href="https://hacks.mozilla.org/2011/08/animating-with-javascript-from-setinterval-to-requestanimationframe/" rel="nofollow">https://hacks.mozilla.org/2011/08/animating-with-javascript-from-setinterval-to-requestanimationframe/</a>). If somebody loads your site and then clicks away from it to a different tab while your test is running, browsers have adopted the practice of reducing the framerate in inactive tabs in favor of those in the active tab. Testing based on this (incorrect) framerate capability will result in parts of your site being disabled for people who are perfectly capable of running your site with all of the animations intact, so that's something you may need to take into account. In some tests that I ran a couple of months ago, the CSS3 version of an animation was almost always smoother than the JavaScript version of an animation. However, there are now jQuery libraries that bridge this gap by using CSS3 animations when possible, such as jQuery Transit (<a href="http://ricostacruz.com/jquery.transit/" rel="nofollow">http://ricostacruz.com/jquery.transit/</a>).
Tags
Title
singulars
PostAcceptedAnswerId
1. This table or related slice is empty.
PostParentId
1. PORunning a quick Javascript benchmark on first load
 singulars
 PostTypePostTypeId
 PTQuestion
PostTypePostTypeId
1. PTAnswer
UserLastEditorUserId
1. This table or related slice is empty.
UserOwnerUserId
1. USJake Jordan
plurals
PostLinksPostIdRelatedPostId
1. This table or related slice is empty.
PostLinksRelatedPostIdPostId
1. This table or related slice is empty.
PostsAcceptedAnswerId
1. This table or related slice is empty.
PostsParentIdCreationDate
1. This table or related slice is empty.
VotesPostIdCreationDate
1. VO
 singulars
 PostPostId
 PO
 UserUserId
 This table or related slice is empty.
 VoteTypeVoteTypeId
 VTUpMod
CommentsPostId
1. This table or related slice is empty.

Querying!

Guidance

A row detail

Detail views are divided into sections. All the information in the data section comes from columns in the selected row. The other sections display data from other, related rows.

Related data can be related in a to-one or a to-many fashion. Captions of data related in a to-many fashion link to a list view showing a filtered view of the table.

Try moving around until you find a non-empty to-many entry and click on the label to get to one. You can move back to the root by clicking on the database name in the header.