Databases
StackOverflow2013
Postsdbo
POCan a maven mojo relying on Aether be compatible with Maven 3.0.x and 3.1.x?
 

Note that there are some explanatory texts on larger screens.

plurals
  1. POCan a maven mojo relying on Aether be compatible with Maven 3.0.x and 3.1.x?
    primarykey
    data
    text
    <p><a href="http://maven.apache.org/docs/3.1.0/release-notes.html">The 3.1.0 release of Maven</a> relies on Eclipse Aether (org.eclipse.aether) instead of Sonatype Aether (org.sonatype.aether). This seems to break compatibility for plugins relying on Sonatype aether : try running such plugins and you'll run into :</p> <pre><code>java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError: org/sonatype/aether/* Caused by: java.lang.ClassNotFoundException: org.sonatype.aether.* </code></pre> <p>As documented in <a href="https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MAVEN/AetherClassNotFound">https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MAVEN/AetherClassNotFound</a> </p> <p>Now, <strong>is it possible to make a mojo relying on aether classes</strong> (such as org.sonatype.aether.RepositorySystemSession) <strong>run both with Maven 3.0.x and Maven 3.1.x ?</strong> </p> <p>Or do I have to release two versions of the same plugin, one for 3.0.x and one for 3.1.x ? Putting enforcer rules like this :</p> <pre><code> &lt;plugin&gt; &lt;groupId&gt;org.apache.maven.plugins&lt;/groupId&gt; &lt;artifactId&gt;maven-enforcer-plugin&lt;/artifactId&gt; &lt;version&gt;1.3&lt;/version&gt; &lt;executions&gt; &lt;execution&gt; &lt;id&gt;enforce-maven&lt;/id&gt; &lt;goals&gt; &lt;goal&gt;enforce&lt;/goal&gt; &lt;/goals&gt; &lt;configuration&gt; &lt;rules&gt; &lt;requireMavenVersion&gt; &lt;version&gt;[3.0,3.1)&lt;/version&gt; &lt;/requireMavenVersion&gt; &lt;/rules&gt; &lt;/configuration&gt; &lt;/execution&gt; &lt;/executions&gt; &lt;/plugin&gt; </code></pre> <p><a href="http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/maven-dev/201307.mbox/%3CCAJHJdS80QHndKLbjHznmBr7vywnQF8PxeUn1uFhX_EXAa_HV9g@mail.gmail.com%3E">I already posted the question on Maven developers mailing list</a>, but no answer so far...</p>
    singulars
    1. This table or related slice is empty.
    1. This table or related slice is empty.
    1. PTQuestion
    1. This table or related slice is empty.
    1. USAnthony Dahanne
    plurals
    1. This table or related slice is empty.
    1. This table or related slice is empty.
    1. This table or related slice is empty.
    1. PO
      singulars
      1. PTAnswer
    2. PO
      singulars
      1. PTAnswer
    1. VO
      singulars
      1. POCan a maven mojo relying on Aether be compatible with Maven 3.0.x and 3.1.x?
      1. This table or related slice is empty.
      1. VTUpMod
    2. VO
      singulars
      1. POCan a maven mojo relying on Aether be compatible with Maven 3.0.x and 3.1.x?
      1. This table or related slice is empty.
      1. VTUpMod
    3. VO
      singulars
      1. POCan a maven mojo relying on Aether be compatible with Maven 3.0.x and 3.1.x?
      1. This table or related slice is empty.
      1. VTUpMod
    1. COThe best thing is to show the source code where it fails so we might give better hints.
      singulars
      1. POCan a maven mojo relying on Aether be compatible with Maven 3.0.x and 3.1.x?
      1. USkhmarbaise
 

Querying!

 
Guidance
A row detail

Detail views are divided into sections. All the information in the data section comes from columns in the selected row. The other sections display data from other, related rows.

Related data can be related in a to-one or a to-many fashion. Captions of data related in a to-many fashion link to a list view showing a filtered view of the table.

Try moving around until you find a non-empty to-many entry and click on the label to get to one. You can move back to the root by clicking on the database name in the header.

SQuiL has stopped working due to an internal error.

If you are curious you may find further information in the browser console, which is accessible through the devtools (F12).

Reload