Databases
StackOverflow2013
Postsdbo
PO
 

Note that there are some explanatory texts on larger screens.

plurals
  1. PO
    primarykey
    data
    text
    <p>I don't know if this is in topic for S.O. (may be more in programmers?) Anyway, Boost and ISO are two very different things. The "standard" is what the language "IS", and contains what is required to characterize the language for ANY purpose. Boost is a library that "extends" functionality to specific problems.</p> <p>Boost committee operate on "quality" of the code (not on its subject), the standard operates on the "spread" (assuming the quality is given). Not everything that is "good" is also "common". What boost does goes in the standard when it is found to be enough common. And does not go "the way boost did it". It goes in form of a specification that compiler distributor have to satisfy. </p> <p>Boost is written in a way that many compiler can work with it. The standard library is written in a way the compiler it goes with (or the family of compilers it goes with) plays better with it (and there are virtually a number as the compiler family can be out there). The kind of optimization and eventual low level tweaking is different.</p> <p>The fact that some boost libraries became part of the standard is not an automatic consequence. It's just a matter of coincidence of some "good ideas" that where found needed in virtually any code.</p> <p>That said, your intent is not necessarily wrong: it may happen for the particular subject you asked. But there is no "migration progress" from boost to the standard and no standard prerequisite that requires to be before in boost.</p>
    singulars
    1. This table or related slice is empty.
    1. POWhy didn't C++11 incorporate all of Boost's type traits?
      singulars
      1. PTQuestion
    1. PTAnswer
    1. This table or related slice is empty.
    1. USEmilio Garavaglia
    plurals
    1. This table or related slice is empty.
    1. This table or related slice is empty.
    1. This table or related slice is empty.
    1. This table or related slice is empty.
    1. VO
      singulars
      1. PO
      1. This table or related slice is empty.
      1. VTUpMod
    2. VO
      singulars
      1. PO
      1. This table or related slice is empty.
      1. VTUpMod
    3. VO
      singulars
      1. PO
      1. This table or related slice is empty.
      1. VTUpMod
    1. COI could be wrong, but I think the OP is looking for whether there are maybe specific shortcomings in the traits the standards committee decided not to carry over.
      singulars
      1. PO
      1. USMichael Burr
    2. COYes, this is also possible. It depends on what you and the OP mean with "*short* term". Is C++11 to c++14 transition *short* to both of you? If no, my generic answer make sense. If yes, better answer to that specific subject may come. Good point!
      singulars
      1. PO
      1. USEmilio Garavaglia
    3. COBoost and ISO are not _that_ different. There is a very significant personal overlap. See first line of http://www.boost.org/community/
      singulars
      1. PO
      1. USMSalters
 

Querying!

 
Guidance
A row detail

Detail views are divided into sections. All the information in the data section comes from columns in the selected row. The other sections display data from other, related rows.

Related data can be related in a to-one or a to-many fashion. Captions of data related in a to-many fashion link to a list view showing a filtered view of the table.

Try moving around until you find a non-empty to-many entry and click on the label to get to one. You can move back to the root by clicking on the database name in the header.

SQuiL has stopped working due to an internal error.

If you are curious you may find further information in the browser console, which is accessible through the devtools (F12).

Reload