Databases
StackOverflow2013
Postsdbo
PO
 

Note that there are some explanatory texts on larger screens.

plurals
  1. PO
    primarykey
    data
    text
    <blockquote> <p>I am reviewing an educational website and it does not pass HTML5 nor CSS w3.org acessibility tests. Is this the norm? Do any sites these days pass these tests?</p> </blockquote> <p>The W3C validator was updated about two months ago to look at HTML5. There are some bugs, but I haven't been following the progress. The bugs are mainly around some ARIA-stuff. In general it is good to get the code as valid as possible. Note if the validator says it is 100% valid code, that doesn't mean the site is accessible, it isn't an accessibility tester. The same goes for the CSS test, it matches your CSS to the spec, and makes sure that youu have <code>:</code> and <code>;</code> in the right places. It may some color contrast tests, but I am not 100% on that. If the validator does, it uses WCAG 2.0 to check the ratios.</p> <blockquote> <p>Bad value Format for attribute name on element meta: Keyword format is not registered. &amp; did not start a character reference. (&amp; probably should have been escaped as &amp;.)</p> </blockquote> <p>This is an age old issue. Somewhere you have an <code>&amp;</code>, maybe for a link, such as: <code>mysite.com/var1=Ryan&amp;var2=B</code>. The validator thinks you are trying to say <code>&amp;var2</code> is a valid HTML entity and saying that your link should be coded as <code>mysite.com/var1=Ryan&amp;amp;var2=B</code>.</p> <blockquote> <p>Property border-radius doesn't exist in CSS level 2.1 but exists in [css3] : 10px Unknown pseudo-element or pseudo-class :nth-child </p> </blockquote> <p>Either the CSS Validator is still checking against the CSS 2.1 Spec or it is saying "Hey not all browers understand CSS3 yet, so you may want to change it."</p>
    singulars
    1. This table or related slice is empty.
    1. POAre any sites HTML5 or CSS W3C level 2.1 valid?
      singulars
      1. PTQuestion
    1. PTAnswer
    1. This table or related slice is empty.
    1. USRyan B
    plurals
    1. This table or related slice is empty.
    1. This table or related slice is empty.
    1. POAre any sites HTML5 or CSS W3C level 2.1 valid?
      singulars
      1. PTQuestion
    1. This table or related slice is empty.
    1. VO
      singulars
      1. PO
      1. This table or related slice is empty.
      1. VTUpMod
    2. VO
      singulars
      1. PO
      1. This table or related slice is empty.
      1. VTAcceptedByOriginator
    1. COThank you @Ryan-B
      singulars
      1. PO
      1. USuser2453910
 

Querying!

 
Guidance
A row detail

Detail views are divided into sections. All the information in the data section comes from columns in the selected row. The other sections display data from other, related rows.

Related data can be related in a to-one or a to-many fashion. Captions of data related in a to-many fashion link to a list view showing a filtered view of the table.

Try moving around until you find a non-empty to-many entry and click on the label to get to one. You can move back to the root by clicking on the database name in the header.

SQuiL has stopped working due to an internal error.

If you are curious you may find further information in the browser console, which is accessible through the devtools (F12).

Reload